Teams

Samuell Grand/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

14 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-31vs McKinney/Legault-Steglich W3.5FWon 20
W#2 DoublesTaylor Nicholson / Madison Rust vs Judy Steglich / Danette Goodyear6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEmily Hildebrand / Kristen Merrill vs Tammi Cole / Adrienne Roberts3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-17vs Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W 3.5FSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmanda Robertson / Corinne Carpenter vs Kristi Barrientos / Cynthia Bunch6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Forrest / Lisa Montgomery vs Terri Shives / Deedee Wise4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-10vs High Point/Cavey W3.5FSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMegan Denton / Halie Overton vs Michele Mandell / Anne Savino6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMadison Rust vs Duang-Nate TRISARNSRI6-4, 7-6
2025-10-03vs Las Colinas CC/DeMarque W3.5FSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCorinne Carpenter / Jennifer Evans vs Tara Chiapelli / Andrea Conley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Ray / Kristen Merrill vs Patty Georgeadis / Sara Wadlington2-6, 1-6
2025-09-26vs The Lakes TA/Fain-Bingham W3.5FLost 01
L#3 DoublesShelby Dolson / Lisa Montgomery vs Melanie Leach / Natalie Weatherford7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-19Won 20
W#1 SinglesMadison Rust vs Meghan Rosener6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristen Merrill / Angela Ray vs Rachel Brownlee / Kim Henke6-2, 6-4
2025-09-12vs Royal Oaks/Korinek W3.5FWon 30
W#1 SinglesMadison Rust vs Laurie Korinek6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDawn Patterson / Halie Overton vs Kathy Adams / Ashley Jeter6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Forrest / Katie Pearson vs Courtney Mayberry / Courtney Wegman7-5, 6-2
2025-09-05vs DAC/Frazure-Shepardson W3.5FWon 21
W#1 SinglesMadison Rust vs Meredith Gibbs3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCorinne Carpenter / Jennifer Evans vs Heather Evetts / Jessica Pierce6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAngela Ray / Lisa Montgomery vs Jenny Littlefield / Carol Barrows4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Amanda Robertson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Halie Overton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Corinne Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Constance Cherones
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.26
Katie Pearson
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Julie Forrest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Erika Burton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Emily Hildebrand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Taylor Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lisa Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Kristen Merrill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Madison Rust
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Molly Carson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Shelby Dolson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Nicholson + Constance Cherones4254% games+12.9% vs expected
Taylor Nicholson + Corinne Carpenter224 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Nicholson + Emily Hildebrand224 matchesnot enough data
Constance Cherones + Emily Hildebrand224 matchesnot enough data
Corinne Carpenter + Amanda Robertson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Robertson
30W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Halie Overton
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Corinne Carpenter
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Constance Cherones
32W–7L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Katie Pearson
19W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Julie Forrest
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Erika Burton
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Hildebrand
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Taylor Nicholson
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Lisa Montgomery
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
Kristen Merrill
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.06
Madison Rust
19W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Molly Carson
25W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shelby Dolson
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.