Teams

PRC NAVY

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs CCV ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Oshman / Duke Mooney vs Eli Goldstein / Joel Aronoff6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMax Dickman vs Josh Heckendorf6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Smith / Michael Swan vs Jason Abrams / Alex Sachen6-3, 6-4
2026-08-18vs HRCA-S GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Oshman / Jeff Smith vs John Belcher / Daniel Bruetting7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMichael Swan vs Brandon Dale6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMax Dickman / Duke Mooney vs William Hunzicker / Frank Johns6-0, 6-0
2026-08-11vs VCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Smith / Mark Oshman vs Brian Fisher / Chris Heath6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMax Dickman vs Charles Cook3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlan Aguilar / David Richards vs Michael Miller / Blair Gifford7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-04vs PRC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMax Dickman / David Richards vs Jordan Rigberg / Prasenjit Mitra4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDuke Mooney vs Luis Hidalgo4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Smith / Michael Swan vs Matthew Montoya / Rob Hill6-3, 6-3
2026-07-28vs CPV GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Oshman / Alan Aguilar vs Bill Henry / Tony Hildebrand4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Richards vs Allan Hoover7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Smith / Duke Mooney vs Michael Shorts / John Cranston6-4, 6-2
2026-07-21vs CR-DC NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Swan / Duke Mooney vs Marc Hossack / John Dyer7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMark Oshman vs Brian O'Sullivan7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAlan Aguilar / Max Dickman vs Tom Dutcher / Bryan Watson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Michael Swan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.39
Mark Oshman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.39
Duke Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Alan Aguilar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Max Dickman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.16
David Richards
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Aguilar + David Richards213 matchesnot enough data
Alan Aguilar + Max Dickman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Swan
43W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Mark Oshman
16W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Duke Mooney
7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Alan Aguilar
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Max Dickman
8W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
David Richards
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.