Teams

Flint River/Coy Chambers

2024 Flint River USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall · Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-01-07vs Bainbridge/HeardWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrian Bellamy / Craig Moore vs Donald Barber / Glenn Heard2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCoy Chambers / Neal Hilliard vs Bob Nunnery / Leo Peace6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBobby York / George Thomas Harrison vs Tom Griffin / Jordan Griffin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-03vs Bainbridge/HeardWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Anglin / Brian Bellamy vs Stephen Mayfield / Leo Peace6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKrishnan Viswanathan / George Thomas Harrison vs Jordan Griffin / Joe McGlincy6-0, 6-2
2023-09-30vs Bainbridge/HeardSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGarrett Lovell / George Thomas Harrison vs Stephen Mayfield / Bob Nunnery7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCraig Moore / Brian Bellamy vs Leo Peace / Joe McGlincy2-6, 2-6
2023-09-23vs Bainbridge/HeardLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Anglin / Brian Bellamy vs Joe McGlincy / Stephen Mayfield3-6, 4-6
2023-09-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Bellamy / Coy Chambers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Matthew Hilliard
published
3.83
George Thomas Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Neal Hilliard
published
3.67
Coy Chambers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Brian Bellamy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
3.43
Chris Anglin
published 4
3.40
Bobby York
published 4
3.17
Jeff Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neal Hilliard + Matthew Hilliard5070% games+4.8% vs expected
Coy Chambers + Brian Bellamy2645% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Hilliard
13W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
George Thomas Harrison
65W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Neal Hilliard
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Coy Chambers
71W–99L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Brian Bellamy
131W–146L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Krishnan Viswanathan
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.45
4
Chris Anglin
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.43
4
Bobby York
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.40
Jeff Davis
5W–16L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.