Teams

2022 Mixed 18 & over 7.0- Caguas Rahiza Lebron

Mixed 18 & Over 2022 · Mixed 18 & Over 7.0- Flight 1

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#3 DoublesSheila Gomez / Carlos Perez-Castellano vs Yolanda Berrios / Antonio Perez Campos5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRafael Pena / Veronica Montanez vs Emily Borges / Jose Colon6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarlos Perez-Castellano / Sheila Gomez vs Jaime Flores / Elizabeth Espinosa-Morales7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMichelle Matos Miranda / Christopher Fontanez vs Sylvia Lopez / Daniel Maldonado0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRafael Pena / Sheila Gomez vs Jenniffer Rodriguez-Rivera / Antonio Morales2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Gomez / Carlos Perez-Castellano vs Ashley Flores / Antonio Abraham-Rivera2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJuan Morales / Veronica Montanez vs Sylvia Lopez / Danny Rivera7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLuis Aponte / Sheila Gomez vs Natalia Zofakis / Arnaldo Cruz5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRafael Pena / Veronica Montanez vs Ashley Flores / Antonio Abraham-Rivera3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesChristopher Fontanez / Rahiza Lebron vs Joey Rodriguez / Yomayra Berrios6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesManuel Bermudez / Sheila Gomez vs JOSE RODRIGUEZ / Elizabeth Padial0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVeronica Montanez / Rafael Pena vs Cristina Rivera / Victor Tirado7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRafael Pena / Veronica Montanez vs Humberto Lizardi / Elizabeth Padial2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & Over 7.0- Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Luis Aponte
published
3.37
Christopher Fontanez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Veronica Montanez
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ileana Vazquez
published 3
2.39
Rahiza Lebron
published
Manuel Bermudez
published
Rafael Pena
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sheila Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Montanez + Rafael Pena134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carlos Perez-Castellano
4W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Luis Aponte
15W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Christopher Fontanez
32W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Veronica Montanez
41W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Ileana Vazquez
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rahiza Lebron
15W–35L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.39
Manuel Bermudez
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rafael Pena
31W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheila Gomez
75W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.