Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Kim-WN/SU10

2025 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Joseph Dychioco
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.82
Steinway Huang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Manoj Parmar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Sang Ur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Shih-hao James Pang
published
3.48
Woo Kim
published
3.46
Kamron Shahriaree
published
3.40
Dusty Summers
published
3.29
George Cheah
published
Andy Baker
published 3.5
3.22
Geoff Heminway
published
3.16
John Bragg
published
3.13
Jonathan Ly
published
3.12
Jose Ochoa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Peter Yen
published
3.11
Jai Dicipulo
published
2.87
Mark Lacson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dwight Guinto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Woo Kim + Shih-hao James Pang5066% games+22.0% vs expected
John Bragg + Dusty Summers9358% games+3.3% vs expected
Woo Kim + Joseph Dychioco5454% games−1.9% vs expected
Sang Ur + Steinway Huang15560% games−7.9% vs expected
Manoj Parmar + Kamron Shahriaree3243% gamesnot enough data
Dusty Summers + Kamron Shahriaree404 matchesnot enough data
Manoj Parmar + Steinway Huang303 matchesnot enough data
Dusty Summers + Sang Ur033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joseph Dychioco
40W–27L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Steinway Huang
73W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Manoj Parmar
148W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Sang Ur
57W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Shih-hao James Pang
23W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.56
Woo Kim
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Kamron Shahriaree
51W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Dusty Summers
37W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
George Cheah
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
Andy Baker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Geoff Heminway
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
John Bragg
24W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
Jonathan Ly
39W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Jose Ochoa
17W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Peter Yen
6W–20L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
Jai Dicipulo
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Mark Lacson
22W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Dwight Guinto
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.