Teams

McKeon

2026 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-13vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 03
L#1 SinglesKonrad Huppi vs Eric Duer5-7
L#2 SinglesHugo Frega vs Jason Brennan0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMahmood Solaiman vs Nobuyasu Sugimoto0-6, 3-6
2026-08-08vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 03
L#1 SinglesScott Ward vs Jason Brennan0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPeter Tice vs Nobuyasu Sugimoto1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMahmood Solaiman vs Lee Jansky2-6, 2-6
2026-08-04vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 12
W#1 SinglesDavid Glasgow vs Eric Duer6-0, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKonrad Huppi vs Jesse Brooks3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHugo Frega vs Salvatore Scanio5-7, 3-3
2026-08-02vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 12
W#1 SinglesDavid Glasgow vs Eric Duer7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKonrad Huppi vs Sam de Silva0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesPeter Tice vs Lee Jansky2-6, 3-6
2026-07-21vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 03
L#1 SinglesJuan Luis Garcia vs Jason Brennan1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Glasgow vs Sam de Silva2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesRichard McKeon vs Salvatore Scanio4-6, 0-6
2026-07-14vs Scanio - You've Been ServedWon 21
L#1 SinglesJuan Luis Garcia vs Nobuyasu Sugimoto3-6, 5-1
W#2 SinglesKonrad Huppi vs Lee Jansky6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDavid Glasgow vs Keiichi Nakatani6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-07-07vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 03
L#1 SinglesJuan Luis Garcia vs Jason Brennan2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Glasgow vs Nobuyasu Sugimoto5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKonrad Huppi vs Salvatore Scanio2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
David Glasgow
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.91
Konrad Huppi
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.91
Juan Luis Garcia
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Milad Ebrahimi
published
2.74
Scott Ward
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.63
Richard McKeon
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.56
Mahmood Solaiman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Hugo Frega
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mahmood Solaiman + Richard McKeon6357% gamesnot enough data
Peter Tice + Richard McKeon3355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Glasgow
12W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Konrad Huppi
13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Juan Luis Garcia
18W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Milad Ebrahimi
10W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Scott Ward
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Mahmood Solaiman
79W–158L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Hugo Frega
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.