Teams

LDHeicken/PAC

2022 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-20vs LGHaislip/TrumpWon 10
W#1 DoublesDerek Heicken / Gary Latimer vs Forde Aley / Jeremy Harrison6-4, 6-4
2022-04-13vs LRCaballero/NMP 40sLost 02
L#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Gary Latimer vs Roberto Caballero / JaMarr Funderburg6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDerek Heicken / Brett Purdy vs Thomas Stephen / Ben Dunn6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-06vs LJLA-Lands/CSDWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom McElhenny / Gary Latimer vs Jonathan Hole / Craig Hughes6-4, 6-2
2022-03-30vs LJDoyle40/NMPSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGary Latimer / Tom McElhenny vs Joseph Ward / Charles Hayes6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeff Lloyd / Derek Heicken vs Kalpathi Subramanian / Jeffrey Hornock5-7, 1-6
2022-03-23vs LDBaker/NMP 40s 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDerek Heicken / Tom McElhenny vs George McRorie / Dewey Baker7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-02vs LJBanner/PeninsulaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGeorge Harris / Tom McElhenny vs Bill Moore / William Schirmer6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJeff Lloyd / Derek Heicken vs Seth Berkman / Ryan Whalen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Tom McElhenny
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Nimish Amin
published
3.55
Gary Latimer
published 4
3.40
Kevin Fontana
published
3.26
Jeff Lloyd
published
3.07
Derek Heicken
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Heicken + Tom McElhenny1435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tom McElhenny
70W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Nimish Amin
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Gary Latimer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Kevin Fontana
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
Jeff Lloyd
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Derek Heicken
33W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.