Teams

Jambor 40+ Fall 24

2025 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 3.5 WOMEN 40N1S3D

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-18vs Jackson/Wiles 40nightLost 04
L#1 DoublesSusan Jambor / Michele Elliott vs Pamela Keller / Elizabeth Minamitani3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDesiree McGann vs Pam Deerman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Holt / Christine Mannor vs Elizabeth Kenney / Jane Bise3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBonnie Maples / Velvet Hopkins vs Judy Wiles / Mary Wright1-6, 0-6
2024-11-05vs HU - PerezLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Holt / Christine Mannor vs Brenda Formby / Sylvia Dean6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah O'Malley / Laura Boothe vs Melissa Jose / Melinda Anderson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Jambor / Desiree McGann vs Brenda Perez / Andrea Stewart2-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs Green 3.5 40+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Williams / Carolyn Holt vs Marianna Wester / Maribeth Newman0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDesiree McGann vs Leslie Cooper1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Jambor / Michele Elliott vs Nancy West / Barbara Doty2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-03vs Jackson/Wiles 40nightLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Scarborough / Christine Mannor vs Janet Mmbaha / Pam Deerman4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDesiree McGann vs Rochelle Davis4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVelvet Hopkins / Susan Jambor vs Kim Anderson / Elizabeth Minamitani1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Michele Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Desiree McGann
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Carolyn Holt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Christine Mannor
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Lisa Pant
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.86
Wendy Scarborough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Laura Boothe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Deborah O'Malley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bonnie Maples
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Velvet Hopkins
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.44
Susan Jambor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Holt + Lisa Pant3445% games+6.0% vs expected
Velvet Hopkins + Deborah O'Malley3540% games−0.9% vs expected
Carolyn Holt + Christine Mannor0538% games−3.1% vs expected
Carolyn Holt + Velvet Hopkins033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Jambor + Michele Elliott033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Jambor + Christine Mannor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Elliott
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Desiree McGann
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carolyn Holt
15W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Christine Mannor
55W–87L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Lisa Pant
40W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Wendy Scarborough
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.86
Laura Boothe
20W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Deborah O'Malley
23W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Bonnie Maples
0W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Velvet Hopkins
18W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Susan Jambor
1W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.