Teams

RMTC RED

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-20vs MEA GOLDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRoseanne Amoils / Damaris Ayuso vs Kristy Westnedge / Tamara Harvey6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPat Noyes / Kathy Blockwick vs Hilary Talocco / Catherine Faughnan7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2023-06-13vs RCC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Blockwick / Pat Noyes vs Diane Misgen / Tonya Johnson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTsugumi Richards / Linda Levy vs Lisa Highley / Jeanne Vonachen7-6, 6-4
2023-06-06vs LTA-Q GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJanet Ryden / Roseanne Amoils vs Jodie Morgan / Carol Schwendener5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTsugumi Richards / Sylvia Henderson vs Tracy King / Dena Stark2-6, 1-6
2023-05-30vs LTA-P BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRoseanne Amoils / Heather Smith vs Kristin Parsons / Stephanie Stone5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Blockwick / Pat Noyes vs Alicia Hillen / Amy Paterra6-1, 6-0
2023-05-16vs MEA GOLDLost 01
L#3 DoublesDamaris Ayuso / Roseanne Amoils vs Kristy Westnedge / Alice Madden1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Heather Smith
published
3.38
Tsugumi Richards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Linda Levy
published
3.02
Kathy Blockwick
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Roseanne Amoils
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Cheri Belz
published 3
Janet Ryden
published
Pat Noyes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roseanne Amoils + Tsugumi Richards2344% games+2.3% vs expected
Linda Levy + Janet Ryden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Smith
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.78
3.5
Tsugumi Richards
68W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Linda Levy
11W–30L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Kathy Blockwick
29W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Roseanne Amoils
23W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Cheri Belz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Ryden
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pat Noyes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.