Teams

IE-SanSer-West

2023 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - IE · IE Men 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.11 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-23vs IE-Chon Bier BuddiesLost 01
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Chirag Jain vs Khang Le / Scott Carr4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-09-16vs IE-LLW-TCC-CardonaLost 02
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Erik Martinez vs Richard Eddy / Andrew Weisman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBlason Taon / John Espinosa vs Chad Brantley / James Fidak1-6, 2-6
2023-09-09vs IE-Elevenis-Brian LeeLost 01
L#2 DoublesBlason Taon / Bambang Tamsur vs Juan Carlos Munoz / Jeff Bixler2-6, 1-6
2023-07-29vs IE-Elevenis-Brian LeeWon 10
W#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Chirag Jain vs Khuong Le / Vincent Nguyen3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesErik Martinez / EVAN CHANG vs Miko Potes / Maki Potes4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBlason Taon / Elliott Kiedrowski vs Stephen Mejia / Javier Rodriguez6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2023-07-08vs IE-LLW-TCC-CardonaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlain Tseng / EVAN CHANG vs David Weisman / Jeff Bivens4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBlason Taon / James Hoffman vs Dennis Ho / David Nighbert6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erik Martinez
published 5
4.32
Vishnu Sriram
published
3.99
EVAN CHANG
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
James Hoffman
published 4
3.85
Grant Jape
published 4
Eric Dake
published 4
3.65
Chris Alvarez
published 4
3.63
Wayne West
published
3.62
Blason Taon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Bambang Tamsur
published 4
3.44
Ehab Ateia
published 3.5
3.33
Jason Maslach
published
Kenneth Ringia
published
Richard Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Alvarez + James Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Erik Martinez
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vishnu Sriram
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
EVAN CHANG
97W–139L career · 5 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
James Hoffman
15W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Grant Jape
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Eric Dake
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Chris Alvarez
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.65
Wayne West
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Blason Taon
84W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Bambang Tamsur
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Ehab Ateia
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Jason Maslach
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Kenneth Ringia
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Jones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.