Teams

KEvans (OPRC)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.89 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-06vs AArtzt/KWainscott (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKristine Evans / Mary Kay Deering vs Christina McWilliams / Krista Wainscott2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Toomey / Anne Sauls vs Kim Walsh / Jenny Havens6-0, 6-2
2022-04-29vs MSpinner (Springfield)Split 11
L#2 DoublesThanh Nga McIver / Deborah Toomey vs Valerie Clark / Melissa Spinner3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLynn Pronier / Kathleen Kullick vs Beth Hart / Megan Noonan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-22vs JBeal/CWitten (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Kullick / Kristine Evans vs Tracy Brading / Holly Natwick3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMary Kay Deering vs Susan Sutherland2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Sauls / Elizabeth Hall vs Robin Medlock / Nancy Pridnia5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-15vs TWilliams (Weddington)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Valorie Ake vs Sally Davidson / Margaret Dobeck6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Pronier / Thanh Nga McIver vs Whitney D'Allaird / Angela Dotson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Toomey / Anne Sauls vs Suzanne Wlezniak / Emily Brandon6-4, 7-5
2022-04-08vs DVliet (Raintree)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Sarah Murphy vs Denise Vliet / Meritt Schoening3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThanh Nga McIver / Valorie Ake vs Tanya Ormand / Taylor Dries4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristine Evans / Kathleen Kullick vs Liz Hamilton / Judith Skelton6-2, 7-5
2022-04-01vs RHoppe (Carmel)Split 11
W#2 DoublesValorie Ake / Deborah Toomey vs Jane Bolt / Dawn Whitmore6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLynn Pronier / Gail Snook vs Maria Mascia / Meredith Starling2-6, 4-6
2022-03-25vs ANielsen (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesChristi Hart / Anne Sauls vs Taylor Young / Louise Coffelt6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesValorie Ake / Mary Kay Deering vs Amy Nielsen / Meg Perry3-6, 2-6
2022-03-11vs LCraig/KMcGregor (Blakeney)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Kay Deering vs Michelle Wright3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesValorie Ake / Sarah Murphy vs Julie Giordano / Eden Serekeberhan1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesThanh Nga McIver / Kathleen Kullick vs Donna DePollo / Lisa Craig7-5, 6-4
2022-03-04vs CCoover/TSanz (Charlotte Indoor)Won 21
L#1 SinglesValorie Ake vs Kirsten Carson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Kathleen Kullick vs Elizabeth Johnston / Jane Royther6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCourtney Sito / Thanh Nga McIver vs Esther Craig / Stephanie Astley6-4, 6-3
2022-02-25vs LVanBlarcom (Weddington)Won 40
W#1 DoublesKristine Evans / Gabi Gorelick vs Sara Applegate / Kathleen Griffith2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesThanh Nga McIver vs Brandy Bombien4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Sauls / Deborah Toomey vs Sharon Cranford / Anne Burns6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesEllen Archer / Lynn Pronier vs Lori van Blarcom / Chris Marko7-5, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Christi Hart
published 4.5
4.09
Gabi Gorelick
published 4.5
3.81
Mary Kay Deering
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.76
Elizabeth Hall
published 4
3.73
Valorie Ake
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.63
Anne Sauls
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.48
Kristine Evans
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Deborah Toomey
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Ellen Archer
published 3.5
3.24
Lynn Pronier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Thanh Nga McIver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Courtney Sito
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Toomey + Anne Sauls12262% games−0.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Hall + Anne Sauls2543% games−2.2% vs expected
Mary Kay Deering + Valorie Ake5352% games−4.0% vs expected
Kristine Evans + Valorie Ake5749% games−11.9% vs expected
Kristine Evans + Mary Kay Deering0634% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kay Deering + Anne Sauls4258% gamesnot enough data
Thanh Nga McIver + Lynn Pronier314 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Toomey + Valorie Ake224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christi Hart
19W–26L career · type D · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Gabi Gorelick
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
Mary Kay Deering
105W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Elizabeth Hall
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Valorie Ake
68W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Anne Sauls
82W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Kristine Evans
48W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Deborah Toomey
127W–65L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Ellen Archer
18W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Lynn Pronier
45W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Thanh Nga McIver
48W–76L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Courtney Sito
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.