Teams

SD 8.0 Peninsula TC/ Bauer

2022 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Summer - SD · SD - 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#3 DoublesJessica Patron / Steve Potter vs Julie Martin / Jed Galan4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMikell Morissette / Kevin Mallery vs Deborah Fitzgerald / Charles Hamori1-6, 1-6
2022-08-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / PIERRE CHATELAIN vs Charles Hein / Leslie Sauer6-2, 6-2
2022-07-30vs SD 8.0 SDT&RC/ ChannickWon 10
W#3 DoublesAdam Hoch / Tiffany Kellogg vs Charles Angyal / Helen Beran6-1, 7-5
2022-07-17vs SD 8.0 Pacific Beach TC/ HeinWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Ebisuzaki / Steve Potter vs John Tessmer / Sandra Lim6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKevin Mallery / Jessica Patron vs Andrew Gilcrest / Janet Lonneker2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Ebisuzaki / Nicholas Rodrigues vs Wender Hwang / Kim Pathammavong4-6, 2-6
2022-07-02vs SD 8.0 Pacific Beach TC/ HeinWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Thomas Knightly vs John Tessmer / Sophia Richardson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteve Potter / Jessica Patron vs Chip Kislack / Ciara Levine3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-18vs SD 8.0 SDT&RC/ ChannickWon 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Kellogg / Thomas Knightly vs Katerina Govoni / Jeffrey Bertolini6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Tiffany Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.94
Nicholas Rodrigues
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kevin Mallery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
PIERRE CHATELAIN
published
3.27
Steve Potter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Adam Hoch
published 3.5
Kenny Rosenberg
published
Leonard Loventhal
published
Mark Bauer
published
May Sotthivirat
published
Stepanka Hastings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kellogg + Adam Hoch314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tiffany Kellogg
163W–91L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
4.40
4
Nicholas Rodrigues
44W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Kevin Mallery
63W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
PIERRE CHATELAIN
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Steve Potter
33W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Adam Hoch
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Kenny Rosenberg
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leonard Loventhal
5W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Bauer
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
May Sotthivirat
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stepanka Hastings
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.