Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW3.5B

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Julia Peng
published
3.73
Anh-Vi Dao
published 4
3.72
Nadiia Gazda
published
3.72
Robyn Vanderluit
published
3.56
Sally Kim
published
3.40
Twinee Madan
published
3.37
Haewon Kwon
published
3.37
Sonia Whitfield
published
3.33
Gail Fong
published
3.27
Deena Elfar
published 3.5
3.27
Michelle Blake
published
3.25
Susan Fontaine
published
3.24
Cynthia James
published 3.5
3.22
Lauren Roseman
published
3.13
Barbara Westergren
published 3.5
3.13
Patrizia Fazeli
published
3.00
Corrine Fabie
published 3.5
2.98
Vera Parengkuan
published
2.90
Erna Nishime
published
Jeannie Mirassou
published
Katrina Heiles
published
Lise Fox
published
Tatiana Yeremenko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anh-Vi Dao + Sally Kim2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Peng
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Anh-Vi Dao
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Nadiia Gazda
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.72
Robyn Vanderluit
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.72
Sally Kim
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Twinee Madan
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
Haewon Kwon
44W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Sonia Whitfield
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Gail Fong
100W–56L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Deena Elfar
20W–34L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Michelle Blake
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Susan Fontaine
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Cynthia James
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Lauren Roseman
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Barbara Westergren
6W–17L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Patrizia Fazeli
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Corrine Fabie
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Vera Parengkuan
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Erna Nishime
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.90
Jeannie Mirassou
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katrina Heiles
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lise Fox
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tatiana Yeremenko
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.