Teams

Rosedale Frazier

2021 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 W Wednesday

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Scott / Linda Frazier vs Derek Billib / Mary Foxwell3-6, 2-6
2021-03-17vs Sarasota - Payne Park/EvansLost 02
L#1 DoublesGale Ketcham / Linda Frazier vs Debbie Mays / Robin Sheridan7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Jarrettbangs / Carolyn Scott vs Jane Welihozkiy / Linda Mulcahy1-6, 0-6
2021-03-10vs Payne Park Lacroix IIWon 10
W#3 DoublesHelen Fatzinger / Carolyn Scott vs Joanne Watkins / Barbara Komarin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-02-24Split 11
W#1 DoublesGale Ketcham / Linda Frazier vs Kim Towe / Kori White7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Scott / Debbie Jarrettbangs vs Debra Williams / Dawn Spencer1-6, 2-6
2021-02-18vs River Strand KerstenWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Frazier / Sandy Vaughan vs Leanna Jackson / Jenny Sherr6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Scott / Maggie Taylor vs Susan Copeland / Kelly Anderson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-02-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Frazier / Sandy Vaughan vs Kelly Ochsenreiter / Linda Mulcahy3-6, 5-7
2021-02-03vs Payne Park Lacroix IIWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Frazier / Debbie Jarrettbangs vs Rosemarie Herke / Marina Yeliseyev6-4, 6-1
2021-01-20vs River Strand KerstenLost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley Johnson / Linda Frazier vs Leanna Jackson / Jenny Sherr4-6, 4-6
2021-01-13vs Longwood FoxwellWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Frazier / Gale Ketcham vs Sigi Moriece / Elizabeth Trelinski6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Cathy Lakos
published 3.5
3.18
Debbie Jarrettbangs
published 3.5
3.09
Debra Chaffee
published 3.5
3.06
Helen Fatzinger
published 3.5
Carolyn Scott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Liz Biddlecome
published
Shelley Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Frazier + Debra Chaffee224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Lakos
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Debbie Jarrettbangs
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Debra Chaffee
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Helen Fatzinger
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.06
Carolyn Scott
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Frazier
115W–82L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Liz Biddlecome
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelley Johnson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.