Teams

LA - Queen Anne 4.5M

2026 USTA Adult 18 and Over - LA · LA - Men 4.5

23 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-13vs LA - BARbariansWon 32
W#1 DoublesChris Hiromura / Philippe Simard vs Josh Malin / Amir Navab7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLeonardo Kim vs Devon Weber4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGene Park / Aaron Nepomuceno vs Maxim Parasciuc / Mike Wegge2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesIk Jun vs Dan Kashuck6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Gold / Bryan Hudson vs Emmett Malin / Ben Steinberg6-2, 6-0
2026-06-07vs LA - Griffin Club 4.5 MenLost 23
L#1 DoublesJudah Momon / Stephen Matuszeski vs Samir Vora / Nicolas Gentin2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeonardo Kim vs Richard Spurling3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPhilippe Simard / Alan Siu vs Alex Valente / Barzin Pakandam6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGiacomo Picasso vs Loic Bailly4-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGene Park / Jonathan Tseng vs Evan Berman / Brandon Moglen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-31vs LA - HitmenLost 13
W#1 DoublesPhilippe Simard / Stephen Matuszeski vs Kaelan Hicks / Charles Livaudais6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesIk Jun vs Navid Rastegar2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDarwin Hu vs Eric Fandel1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChris Hiromura / Bryan Hudson vs Davis Kop / Charles Barrantes1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAaron Nepomuceno / Ben Remis vs ADRIAN GARCIA / Kyle Wood6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesIk Jun vs Winston Rice3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Hiromura / Steven Lau vs Sebastien Quach / Daniel Kahana6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJonathan Tseng vs Jeremy Quiroz0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRyan Williams / Stephen Matuszeski vs John Lansville / Mikel Maurolagoitia5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-03vs LA - BARbariansSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPatrick Tan / Aaron Nepomuceno vs Renaldo Goncalves / Maxim Parasciuc7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDarwin Hu vs Michael Moshi4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Matuszeski / Judah Momon vs Amir Navab / Perry Saliano6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Marley / Gene Park vs Cort Cass / Brandon Su1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesDaniel Gold / Stephen Matuszeski vs John Lansville / Kyle Wood6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLeonardo Kim vs ADRIAN GARCIA1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGavin Lau / Chris Hiromura vs Mikel Maurolagoitia / Sebastien Quach4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJonathan Tseng vs Winston Rice1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElan Ruspoli / Aaron Nepomuceno vs Deran Christian / Jeremy Quiroz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-19vs LA - Griffin Club 4.5 MenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPhilippe Simard / Aaron Nepomuceno vs Nicolas Gentin / Samir Vora6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniel Gold / Stephen Matuszeski vs Jordan Korris / Alex Valente6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesVishal Raghunath vs Christophe Mc Ferson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBryan Hudson / Jonathan Tseng vs Barzin Pakandam / SEBASTIAN BURKHARDT3-6, 3-6
2026-04-12vs LA - HitmenWon 32
W#1 DoublesLeonardo Kim / Patrick Tan vs Eric Fandel / ISMAEL RODRIGUEZ6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVishal Raghunath vs Emmanuel Fortune7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAaron Nepomuceno / Philippe Simard vs Davis Kop / Alexander Wood6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesIk Jun vs David Graziani3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Gold / Stephen Matuszeski vs Brandon Joe / Joseph Tchan6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Stephen Matuszeski
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.46
Aaron Nepomuceno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.40
Elan Ruspoli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.37
Daniel Gold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.34
Philippe Simard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.29
Patrick Tan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alex Nassif
published 4.5
Darwin Hu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Ik Jun
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.21
Michael Marley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Leonardo Kim
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.18
Gavin Lau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Jonathan Tseng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.13
Ben Remis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.11
Vishal Raghunath
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.10
Casey Reich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.10
Chris Hiromura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.10
Bryan Hudson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Judah Momon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.09
Alan Siu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Gene Park
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Frederik Vig
published
Giacomo Picasso
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judah Momon + Stephen Matuszeski224 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Gold + Stephen Matuszeski404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Marley + Elan Ruspoli303 matchesnot enough data
Chris Hiromura + Alan Siu033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Hiromura + Gavin Lau213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephen Matuszeski
44W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Aaron Nepomuceno
13W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
4.46
Elan Ruspoli
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Daniel Gold
9W–2L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
Philippe Simard
5W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
4.34
Patrick Tan
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Alex Nassif
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Darwin Hu
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ik Jun
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
Michael Marley
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
Leonardo Kim
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
4.18
Gavin Lau
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Jonathan Tseng
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Ben Remis
7W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
4.13
Vishal Raghunath
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Casey Reich
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
4.10
4.5
Chris Hiromura
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Bryan Hudson
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
Judah Momon
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Alan Siu
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
Gene Park
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.71
Frederik Vig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Giacomo Picasso
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.