Teams

USTA Campus-Luter

2024 ORANGESEMINOLE Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-28vs USTA Campus-Macon- MX SpringWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Luter / Joseph Parris vs Kiera Phoebus / Moe Zogheib6-1, 6-1
2024-05-21vs OrangeSeminole/Risco/18&Over6.0MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelia Burr / Adrian Ramirez vs Athena Wong / Joaquin Carvajal3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Wentroth / Janeane Vinson vs Veronika Mayorca / Walter Paniagua del Castillo7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-14vs Sanlando-Monge 6.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesMelia Burr / Adrian Ramirez vs Joel Montes / Yazmin Valentin6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSarah Luter / Lawrence Armor vs Richard Cooper / Lisa van Smith3-6, 0-6
2024-05-07vs USTA Campus-Macon- MX SpringWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Luter / William Crellin vs Suzanne K Castillo / Jorge L Gomez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-23vs Sanlando-Monge 6.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Luter / Lawrence Armor vs Leticia Monge / Jaime Gatpandan5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-04-16vs Sanlando-Monge 6.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJaneane Vinson / Kyle Wentroth vs Richard Cooper / Marites Tandoc7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-09vs OrangeSeminole/Risco/18&Over6.0MXLost 01
L#2 DoublesRob Vinson / Janeane Vinson vs Allan McCormick / Kathy Nguyen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-02vs USTA Campus-Macon- MX SpringWon 20
W#2 DoublesJaneane Vinson / Kyle Wentroth vs Elly Phoebus / Moe Zogheib6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Luter / Kyle Wu vs ARI WARSAGER / Katherine Ozdemir6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Melia Burr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Rob Vinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Joseph Parris
published
2.96
Janeane Vinson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Sarah Luter
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.59
Cindy Strange
published 3
Lawrence Armor
published
Madison Ellsworth
published
Susannah Randolph
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Luter + Rob Vinson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melia Burr
60W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Rob Vinson
56W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Joseph Parris
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Janeane Vinson
86W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Sarah Luter
105W–78L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Cindy Strange
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
Lawrence Armor
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Madison Ellsworth
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susannah Randolph
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.