Teams

CFong-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesSybil Pye / Colleen Starns vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-04vs CKing-SVCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSina Mathew / Tania Wilkins vs Elizabeth Misiti / Chrissy King5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCara Fong / Catherine Fleming vs Lori Small / Kelsey Phillips6-4, 6-0
2025-03-21vs MLong-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Lussier / Colleen Starns vs Julie Beyer / Ciara Coughlin1-6, 2-6
2025-03-07vs JStewart-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine Fleming / Sybil Pye vs Donnetta Hanson / Feyisayomi Otegbade6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNav Grewal / Stephanie Lussier vs Jane Stewart / Jasmine Hemmings4-6, 1-6
2025-02-28vs EPatulski-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesCara Fong / Colleen Starns vs Emily Patulski / Kristi Brubaker3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Gabriela Stefan
published
2.48
Cara Fong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Colleen Starns
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.44
Sina Mathew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Fleming
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.10
Sybil Pye
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nav Grewal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Lussier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tania Wilkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriela Stefan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Cara Fong
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Sina Mathew
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
2.5
Catherine Fleming
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sybil Pye
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.10
Nav Grewal
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Lussier
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tania Wilkins
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.