Teams

KY/LOU/OERTHER/THOMAS

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 2.5 Women-Session One

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-19vs KY/LOU/ZINSER/WOOCKSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEmma Breetz vs Holly Barger6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Earley / Tammie Barrett vs Tracey Woock / Lindsay Zeller0-6, 0-6
2025-04-11vs KY/LOU/NORCIA/RIVESLost 12
L#1 DoublesSophia Mobley / Laci Pauley vs Emily Rives / Kelsey Norcia6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTaylor Wacker vs Anna Malone2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesYana Feygin / Donna Thomas vs Kristin Cloern / Jennifer Huelsman6-2, 6-3
2025-03-08vs KY/LOU/IVESLost 03
L#1 DoublesDayna Thomas / Donna Thomas vs Laura Ochsner / Amanda Ives1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTaylor Wacker vs Jessica Whitmer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYana Feygin / Katie Earley vs Ashley Redenbaugh / Kristin Wurtenberger1-6, 4-6
2025-02-16vs KY/LOU/ZINSER/WOOCKLost 03
L#1 DoublesSophia Mobley / Emma Breetz vs Kelly Hampton / Kelly Hermann3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesYana Feygin vs Rachel Miranda0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Thomas / Katie Archer vs Holly Barger / Whitney Kramer1-6, 4-6
2025-02-08vs KY/LOU/NORCIA/RIVESSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Thomas / Laci Pauley vs Lacey Jurgens / Justine Thomas2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTammie Barrett / Yana Feygin vs LAURA CRAHAN / Laura Yeoman6-3, 6-2
2025-01-17vs KY/LOU/IVESLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmma Breetz / Taylor Wacker vs Krista Cooper / Meredith Smith6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDayna Thomas vs Laura Ochsner1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSamantha Oerther / Katie Earley vs Amanda Ives / Becky Carothers1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women-Session One have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Emma Breetz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.32
Yana Feygin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Laci Pauley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Samantha Oerther
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.22
Dayna Thomas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.20
Sophia Mobley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Donna Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.15
Tammie Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.92
Katie Earley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ellie Phelps
published
Taylor Wacker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Oerther + Sophia Mobley123 matchesnot enough data
Sophia Mobley + Emma Breetz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Breetz
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Yana Feygin
13W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Laci Pauley
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Samantha Oerther
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
3
Dayna Thomas
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.22
Sophia Mobley
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Donna Thomas
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Tammie Barrett
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Katie Earley
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Ellie Phelps
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Wacker
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.