Teams

STC Schroeder

2025 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 5.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-27vs FSSC KushonWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kane / Jenny Kane vs Shae Kimbell / Nicole Ehme6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNiya Fried vs Simone Nixon6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRenuka Dewan / Elizabeth Peyton vs Katie Kase / Sarika Reddy Sunki1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-13vs QRRC HawleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny Kane / Heidi Kane vs Meghan Sorensen / Mara Sheley5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesSamantha Enslen vs Lauren Hawley0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKylee Thiel / Elizabeth Peyton vs Maria Zivick / Audree Mcnichols6-3, 6-4
2025-03-30vs FSSC KushonWon 21
W#1 DoublesKylee Thiel / Elizabeth Peyton vs Nicole Ehme / Angela Wilson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNiya Fried vs Katie Kase3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Fritz / Renuka Dewan vs Beth Kushon / Sarika Reddy Sunki6-3, 6-2
2025-03-22vs QRRC HawleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny Kane / Heidi Kane vs Meghan Sorensen / Mara Sheley4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAmy Fritz vs Audree Mcnichols3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJackie Halderman / Renuka Dewan vs Arian McNeil / Taylor Pritt3-6, 4-6
2025-02-22vs FSSC KushonWon 20
W#1 SinglesJenny Kane vs Simone Nixon6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKylee Thiel / Elizabeth Peyton vs Katie Kase / Beth Kushon6-1, 6-2
2025-01-19vs QRRC HawleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKylee Thiel / Heidi Kane vs Rheanna Morehart / Meghan Sorensen1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJenny Kane vs Lauren Hawley6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTatiana Hwa / Renuka Dewan vs Audree Mcnichols / Miranda Riggs1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2025 Winter A18&O 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STC Schroeder339921172
2FSSC Kushon1551329186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Fritz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.42
Tatiana Hwa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.36
Kylee Thiel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Heidi Kane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Jenny Kane
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.09
Renuka Dewan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
4.05
Elizabeth Peyton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Samantha Enslen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Jackie Halderman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Niya Fried
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kylee Thiel + Elizabeth Peyton4155% games+19.5% vs expected
Heidi Kane + Jenny Kane121548% games+4.2% vs expected
Jackie Halderman + Renuka Dewan3744% games−0.3% vs expected
Renuka Dewan + Samantha Enslen141749% games−2.2% vs expected
Jackie Halderman + Samantha Enslen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amy Fritz
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tatiana Hwa
17W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
Kylee Thiel
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
Heidi Kane
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
4.21
Jenny Kane
19W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
4.15
Renuka Dewan
102W–90L career · 12 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Elizabeth Peyton
32W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Samantha Enslen
81W–96L career · 8 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Jackie Halderman
27W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.87
Niya Fried
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.