Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.5 4.Wheaton Exner Fri 7:30 $20

CDTA 1Summer Adult 18 & Over · CDTA 18 & Over M 4.5 Summer

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-20Won 10
W#2 SinglesReid Bertsche vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesScott Robinson / Whitney Brooks vs Eric H Lo / Brad Smith6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYuto Tsukida vs Daniel Sternfield6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesClay Corso / Travis Reimers vs Mark Sack / Jeff Callen6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMatthew Johnson / Rafael Ramalho vs Lubos Vegh / Edwin Baldwin6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesAnthony Noti / Mark Exner vs Rod Wienke / Jason Strongin2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJeremiah Yi vs Erik Watkins6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMasanori Suzuki vs Grant Gordon7-6, 7-6
W#1 DoublesScott Robinson / Kevin Kamenjarin vs Eric H Lo / Scott Bondurant6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTravis Reimers vs Nick Charlton-Perrin4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoshua Luetkehans / Matthew Johnson vs Gary Gerstman / Jeff Callen7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJeremiah Yi vs Michael Baddeloo4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYuto Tsukida / Anthony Noti vs Edwin Baldwin / Brad Smith5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesKevin Kamenjarin / Zsolt Juhasz vs Peter Shields / Jason Strongin3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRafael Ramalho vs Kamil Kozerski0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesErik Halperin / Joshua Luetkehans vs Rod Wienke / Brian Thomason6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesReid Bertsche vs Jean Michel Dos Remedios1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClay Corso / Mark Exner vs David Peistrup / Thomas Tranter2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CDTA 18 & Over M 4.5 Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA A18&O 4.5M River Trails Tranter7030519216
2CDTA S 18&OM4.5 6.North Shore Sternfield Sun 3 $2552191637286
3CDTA S 18&OM4.5 1.MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $3043171842279
4CDTA S 18&OM4.5 3.Waveland(OUT) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $1234201536261
5CDTA S 18&OM4.5 4.Wheaton Exner Fri 7:30 $2025142145316
6CDTA S 18&OM4.5 2.Tam Needler Sat 11 $220753062393

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Kevin Kamenjarin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.43
Zsolt Juhasz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Joshua Luetkehans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Erik Halperin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Travis Reimers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Clay Corso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Yuto Tsukida
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.10
Masanori Suzuki
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.07
Mark Exner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.95
Reid Bertsche
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Anthony Noti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jeremiah Yi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Rafael Ramalho
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Whitney Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zsolt Juhasz + Travis Reimers4254% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Mark Exner4160% gamesnot enough data
Erik Halperin + Mark Exner3258% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Erik Halperin134 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Travis Reimers314 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Brooks + Erik Halperin134 matchesnot enough data
Erik Halperin + Kevin Kamenjarin224 matchesnot enough data
Reid Bertsche + Anthony Noti213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kevin Kamenjarin
64W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
4.45
Zsolt Juhasz
45W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
Joshua Luetkehans
52W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
4.41
Erik Halperin
21W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
Travis Reimers
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Clay Corso
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yuto Tsukida
23W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
Masanori Suzuki
50W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
Mark Exner
61W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
4
Reid Bertsche
45W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Anthony Noti
29W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Jeremiah Yi
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rafael Ramalho
26W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Whitney Brooks
11W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.