Teams

JMurphy

2022 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 5.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-13vs LEDMONDSONLost 01
L#3 DoublesLouella Venable / Michele Lee vs Paula Anderson / Suzy Blackwell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-06vs LEDMONDSONWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouella Venable / Janet Murphy vs Jennifer McFarling / Corinne Alavi1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-29vs LEDMONDSONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDane Brackett / Michele Lee vs Anne Axberg / Sarah Winstead7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKimberlei Gill / Marnie Stutts vs Ellen Zimmerman / Suzy Blackwell5-7, 5-7
2022-09-22vs LEDMONDSONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDane Brackett / Michele Lee vs Shirley Chapman / Beth Shelly6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRhonda Rowe / Marnie Stutts vs Sonja Kinzlmaier / Suzy Blackwell1-6, 0-6
2022-09-15vs LEDMONDSONWon 10
W#2 DoublesKrissy Caro / Dane Brackett vs Paula Anderson / Beth Shelly6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKimberlei Gill / Marnie Stutts vs Suzy Blackwell / Sonja Kinzlmaier2-6, 4-6
2022-09-01vs LEDMONDSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesDane Brackett / Michele Lee vs Shirley Chapman / Christy van Ness4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Kimberlei Gill
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.55
Michele Lee
published
2.53
Dane Brackett
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.30
Krissy Caro
published
2.16
Rhonda Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.09
Louella Venable
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.00
Terry Marcott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Rowe + Kimberlei Gill172049% games−1.0% vs expected
Kimberlei Gill + Louella Venable6450% gamesnot enough data
Dane Brackett + Louella Venable3541% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Rowe + Louella Venable2631% gamesnot enough data
Dane Brackett + Kimberlei Gill2342% gamesnot enough data
Dane Brackett + Rhonda Rowe044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kimberlei Gill
255W–206L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
Michele Lee
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Dane Brackett
33W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
2.53
Krissy Caro
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.30
2.5
Rhonda Rowe
59W–143L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Louella Venable
44W–115L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Terry Marcott
2W–17L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.