← Teams

SAC-Harwood 8.0

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Alison Marsh Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
—
James Graber
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
—
Neerav Shah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Martin von Haartman
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.61
Susan Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.50
Eric Means
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Molly Odonnell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.31
Lily Looi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.16
Shari Levelle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Paul Harwood
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-03-03Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesFernando Bessa / Lily Looi vs Trina Newcomb / Mike Mon7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEric Means / Laura Rundle vs Mary Bullard / Brandon Shell6-1, 6-2
2024-03-01Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAleli Siruno / Eric Means vs Benjamin Yang / Shannon Chen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Odonnell / David Sefton vs Tony Wang / Hong Huynh3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLily Looi / Eric Means vs Jeroen Swanborn / Donna Roisom6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesFernando Bessa / Susan Ford vs Bill Rhoades / Amy Murphy6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Sefton / Molly Odonnell vs Mike Farrell / Sara Swanborn6-2, 6-3
2024-02-11Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesEric Means / Lily Looi vs David Greenberg / Tina Farrelly7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Graber / Laura Rundle vs Brad Ouderkirk / Carrie Putsch2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartin von Haartman / Alison Marsh Harrison vs Jeff Hanson / Jennifer Simmons6-0, 6-2
2024-02-02Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAlison Marsh Harrison / Martin von Haartman vs Suzanne Chambers / Frank Collie6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLily Looi / Fernando Bessa vs Chizuru Watanabe / Masanori Hibino6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMolly Odonnell / David Sefton vs Jen Lewis / Nathan Austin6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-28Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesDavid Sefton / Molly Odonnell vs Jason Ruhmann / Carrie Putsch6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Rundle / James Graber vs Rudd McGarity / Gina Ossanna6-4, 6-3
2024-01-20Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDavid Sefton / Molly Odonnell vs Kristen Benkstein / Ken Avenoso6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLily Looi / Paul Harwood vs Shannon Roarke / Seth Yount6-3, 6-4
2024-01-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJames Graber / Laura Rundle vs Sekona Taufa / Karen Pickering7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEric Means / Aleli Siruno vs Mark Bernazzani / Krista Mikalatos7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNeerav Shah / Lily Looi vs Mitchell Whitehurst / Carol Chiu6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Alison Marsh Harrison
29W–25L career
not enough data
—
4.5
James Graber
11W–21L career · type M
not enough data
—
4
Neerav Shah
23W–18L career
not enough data
—
4
Martin von Haartman
140W–50L career
7%93%0%
3.64
4
Susan Ford
38W–107L career · type S
11%89%0%
3.61
4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
25%75%0%
3.53
4
Eric Means
26W–48L career
36%64%0%
3.50
4
Molly Odonnell
37W–90L career
40%60%0%
3.48
4
Lily Looi
77W–80L career
85%15%0%
3.31
3.5
Shari Levelle
63W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.16
3.5
Paul Harwood
59W–69L career
14%85%1%
3.14

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.