Teams

A1 ACAC Quilez Wise Aces

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-05vs A6 Southampton FoleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMari Litz / Martinique Kandl vs Andrea Bleck-Smith / CONSTANCE MATTOX6-3, 6-4
2021-05-22vs A4 Burkwood Delaney/DixonWon 10
W#2 SinglesDina Weddle vs Jennifer Hazelgrove6-3, 6-1
2021-05-15vs A2 KRA Kirkeby 3PointKnowWon 20
W#1 SinglesDina Weddle vs Grace Hendrix2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Funk / Martinique Kandl vs Mandy Miller / Krista Quinby6-2, 6-4
2021-05-02vs A3 Hermitage HardestyWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Funk / Martinique Kandl vs Elizabeth Jurkuta / Virginia Cochran6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDina Weddle vs Carrie Boyd6-0, 6-2
2021-05-01vs A5 RCC KochWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Funk / Martinique Kandl vs Laureen Mertz / Amy Wozniak3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-28vs A6 Southampton FoleyWon 10
W#1 SinglesDina Weddle vs Rochelle Preston6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Dina Weddle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.46
Martinique Kandl
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Lisa Smithson
published
3.23
Rebecca Cassilly
published
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.15
Irene Quilez
published 3.5
3.09
Carla Shaffer
published 3.5
3.06
Jennifer Funk
published
2.94
Amy Romero
published 3
2.94
Cecilia Bergh
published 3
2.82
Mari Litz
published
2.62
Diane Reale
published 3
Lisa Aaron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecilia Bergh + Rebecca Cassilly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dina Weddle
148W–61L career · 4 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Martinique Kandl
167W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.46
Lisa Smithson
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Irene Quilez
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Carla Shaffer
23W–29L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Funk
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Amy Romero
21W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Cecilia Bergh
16W–19L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
2.94
Mari Litz
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Diane Reale
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
2.62
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.