Teams

Scott/Nutt 40s 4.5W Wed PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.5 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-10vs Cartee 40s 4.5W Wed PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarianna Bryce / Libby Strickland vs Sarah Dunning / Marla Barnwell1-6, 4-6
2025-05-07vs Cartee 40s 4.5W Wed PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Harlow / Libby Strickland vs Mimi Cartee / Marla Barnwell7-6, 6-3
2025-04-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Nutt / Libby Strickland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-09vs Cartee 40s 4.5W Wed PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Harris / Lauren Nutt vs Karen Regan / Jill Bowman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-02vs Cartee 40s 4.5W Wed PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesLibby Strickland / Samantha Harlow vs Brenda Willis / Marla Barnwell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-26vs Cartee 40s 4.5W Wed PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoanna Scott / Lauren Nutt vs Kara Ray / Leah Price6-4, 6-1
2025-03-19vs Cartee 40s 4.5W Wed PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoanna Scott / Lauren Nutt vs Brenda Willis / Kara Ray7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Beth Harris
published 4.5
4.13
Heidi Bradley
published
4.08
Beth Mayer
published 4.5
4.03
Sarah Blacutt
published
3.99
Joanna Scott
published
3.94
Samantha Harlow
published
3.83
Sarah Groce
published
3.82
Marianna Bryce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Lauren Nutt
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Adriana Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kelly Gaines
published
Susan Henshall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Mayer + Beth Harris7355% games−6.9% vs expected
Sarah Groce + Heidi Bradley4642% games−7.4% vs expected
Lauren Nutt + Beth Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth Harris
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
Heidi Bradley
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Beth Mayer
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Sarah Blacutt
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.03
Joanna Scott
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
Samantha Harlow
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.94
Sarah Groce
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.83
Marianna Bryce
17W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Lauren Nutt
102W–81L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Libby Strickland
127W–109L career · 9 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Adriana Hernandez
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Kelly Gaines
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Henshall
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.