Teams

BKing-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-07vs CGilley-CHCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesHarrison Bailey vs Sammy Myers2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesGreg Sabin vs M Scott Alexander3-6, 1-6
2026-06-30vs JByrd-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAdrian Bruno vs Andrew Hedgpeth2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAdam Williamson vs Barry Gitarts6-2, 6-1
2026-06-16vs RMcGarrah-HRLost 02
L#1 SinglesPablo Araya vs Caleb Kent1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesHarrison Bailey vs Mark Fossum1-6, 1-6
2026-06-02vs SBurger-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAdam Williamson vs Andrew Thorne6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesGreg Sabin vs Surya Sampath2-6, 5-7
2026-05-26vs CYang-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesAdrian Bruno vs Bokang Zhou0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPablo Araya vs Hengning Cao6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHarrison Bailey vs Letian Jiang1-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs GHigh-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesHarrison Bailey vs James Lambert1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAdam Williamson vs Kevin McCarty6-0, 6-1
2026-05-12vs CLynch-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesGreg Sabin vs Tom Luben3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTre Smith vs Gregory Downing0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBRIAN KING vs David Bautz1-6, 6-7
2026-05-05vs RSamulski-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesAdam Williamson vs Richard Samulski6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAdrian Bruno vs Tommy Rose6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesPablo Araya vs Charles McMillan6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CYang-DUR7118612132
2BKing-DUR35101429199
3GHigh-DUR2671741268
4RSamulski-CHTC1751938243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Adam Williamson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.89
Pablo Araya
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.88
BRIAN KING
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.67
Adrian Bruno
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Harrison Bailey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.32
Greg Sabin
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Tre Smith
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adam Williamson
11W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Pablo Araya
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
BRIAN KING
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Adrian Bruno
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
Harrison Bailey
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Greg Sabin
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.32
Tre Smith
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.