Teams

EW-YTC-Lybeck

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-26vs EW-PC-HedbonLost 12
L#1 DoublesRose Longoria / Molly Neal vs Rikki West / Tiffany Hebdon1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Terami vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDana Lybeck / Erika Mullins vs Tina Duncan / Shaelah Harmon1-6, 1-6
2023-02-26vs WCCP-SchnurmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBri Plath / Amy Karau vs Anne Schnurman / ARLENE CUSTER4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLesley Brown / Jennifer Terami vs Debi Herbst / Alissa Long6-0, 6-0
2023-02-25vs EW-PC-HedbonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Lybeck / Erika Mullins vs Mauri Morgan / Shaelah Harmon3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJennifer Terami vs Rikki West6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Neal / Rose Longoria vs Tina Duncan / Susan Duncan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-25vs WCCP-SchnurmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Karau / Lesley Brown vs Alissa Long / Sarah Donahue6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBri Plath / Molly Neal vs Anne Schnurman / Debi Herbst6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Hedbon40102460
2EW-YTC-Lybeck13661382
3WCCP-Schnurman1321021138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Jennifer Terami
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Bri Plath
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Amy Karau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Lesley Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Rose Longoria
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.43
Erika Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Dana Lybeck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesley Brown + Jennifer Terami4174% games+19.4% vs expected
Erika Mullins + Bri Plath3745% games+8.0% vs expected
Lesley Brown + Rose Longoria91441% games+0.7% vs expected
Jennifer Terami + Bri Plath0544% games−1.6% vs expected
Rose Longoria + Amy Karau5350% games−2.0% vs expected
Erika Mullins + Dana Lybeck0631% games−8.9% vs expected
Lesley Brown + Amy Karau3452% gamesnot enough data
Erika Mullins + Rose Longoria224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jennifer Terami
43W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Bri Plath
20W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Amy Karau
16W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Lesley Brown
23W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Rose Longoria
26W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Erika Mullins
26W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
Dana Lybeck
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.