Teams

STC Sayer

2025 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2025 Winter A18&O 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-03vs SRTC BaileyWon 31
W#1 DoublesChad Arnett / Richard Miller vs David Ehlers / Steven Jain6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristopher Kalweit vs Stephen Ward6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichael Pignatiello vs Michael Lee6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Petsch / Tim Sayer vs James Bremar / Andrew Garofoli4-6, 1-6
2025-04-27vs FSSC PaynterLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathan Lucas / Dominic Marino vs Bradley Paynter / Collin McAndrew4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristopher Kalweit vs Alexander Kang1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesIsaac Anderson / Chad Arnett vs Robert Lair / Andrew Pray2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-13vs KTC AguileraWon 31
W#1 DoublesNathan Lucas / Dominic Marino vs Michael Budde / Scott Dooley6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristopher Kalweit vs Nicholas Quiroz4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesIsaac Anderson / Chad Arnett vs Andrew Chong / Ryan Maurer6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRichard Miller / Michael Pignatiello vs Rob Carpenter / Matthew Cary6-4, 7-6
2025-03-22vs QRRC JohannesWon 20
W#1 DoublesNathan Lucas / Dominic Marino vs John Daley / Philip Pierce6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Pignatiello vs Steve Johannes6-0, 6-0
2025-03-08vs WPAFB IdenWon 40
W#1 DoublesNathan Lucas / Dominic Marino vs Joseph Graham / Douglas Iden6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesChristopher Kalweit vs Christopher Sigler6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIsaac Anderson / Chad Arnett vs Tony Brown / Ed Honore6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Miller / Michael Pignatiello vs Tae Kim / David Klump6-0, 6-1
2025-03-02vs QRRC TaylorLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Pignatiello / Nathan Lucas vs Greg Haack / Kevin Weaver3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChristopher Kalweit vs Mason Pierri6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCharles Petsch / Tim Sayer vs Eric Holterman / Kyle Nagel4-6, 5-7
2025-02-02vs KTC WaltersSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNathan Lucas / Dominic Marino vs Evan Slattery / Philip Vandeursen4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Kalweit vs Luke Trubee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIsaac Anderson / Chad Arnett vs Adam Beiersdorfer / Gopal Bhat5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMichael Pignatiello vs Nathan Fullington3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-01-19vs QRRC WenzWon 40
W#1 DoublesVon Clendenen / Nathan Lucas vs Patrick Gill / Joel Somerset6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristopher Kalweit vs Kerry Segebart6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChad Arnett / Michael Pignatiello vs Cory Natoli / Preetham Salehundam6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDominic Marino vs Daryl Parks6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Winter A18&O 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Dominic Marino
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
3.88
Christopher Kalweit
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.85
Nathan Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.78
Michael Pignatiello
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.73
Chad Arnett
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.70
Isaac Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Joel Long
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.35
Charles Petsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Tim Sayer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeffrey Dunker
published
Von Clendenen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominic Marino + Nathan Lucas6172% games+14.3% vs expected
Isaac Anderson + Chad Arnett331259% games+2.0% vs expected
Dominic Marino + Jeffrey Dunker8553% games+1.0% vs expected
Nathan Lucas + Chad Arnett3256% games+0.4% vs expected
Michael Pignatiello + Chad Arnett5357% gamesnot enough data
Tim Sayer + Charles Petsch1440% gamesnot enough data
Dominic Marino + Tim Sayer044 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Dunker + Chad Arnett224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dominic Marino
26W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
4
Christopher Kalweit
38W–28L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Nathan Lucas
55W–31L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Michael Pignatiello
48W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Chad Arnett
73W–42L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Isaac Anderson
45W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Joel Long
36W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.65
3.5
Charles Petsch
82W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Tim Sayer
55W–138L career · 5 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Jeffrey Dunker
39W–33L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Von Clendenen
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.