Teams

SD 7.0 SDTRC/ Hobbie

2025 SoCal 65 & Over Summer-SD · SDNC

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Gayle Kehrli
published 4
3.45
Carol Harris
published 4
3.41
Jackie Niddrie
published 3.5
3.25
Lindy Mamer
published 3.5
3.07
Donna Dube
published 3.5
3.02
Jayne Harriman
published 3.5
2.90
Marva Gesell
published 3
2.81
Nancy Peinado
published 3.5
2.78
Stephanie Erickson
published
2.60
Barbara Hobbie
published 3
Nancy Stevens
published
Rebecca Riley
published
Susan Fike
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindy Mamer + Jackie Niddrie101049% games−3.7% vs expected
Jayne Harriman + Donna Dube3450% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Peinado + Donna Dube1637% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Peinado + Marva Gesell2547% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Erickson + Marva Gesell314 matchesnot enough data
Donna Dube + Marva Gesell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gayle Kehrli
17W–40L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Carol Harris
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Jackie Niddrie
45W–47L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Lindy Mamer
24W–24L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Donna Dube
118W–125L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Jayne Harriman
27W–33L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Marva Gesell
100W–107L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3.5
Nancy Peinado
64W–95L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.81
Stephanie Erickson
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Barbara Hobbie
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Nancy Stevens
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Riley
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Fike
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.