Teams

CROW CANYON CC CW7.5A

2021 COMBO · Women 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-04vs PLEASANTON CW7.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Leeds / Cindy Raykiewicz vs Teresa King / Margaret Gruen6-2, 7-5
2021-11-20vs FREMONT TC CW7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Hawkins / Leda Lim vs Lufelyn Montoya / Julieta Leong3-6, 3-6
2021-11-07vs LIVERMORE VTC CW7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeri Perun / Margaret Harrison vs Nora Hart / Dorothy Costa7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-06vs PLEASANTON CW7.5ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Hawkins / Tiffany Rashkin vs Robin Vranesh / Jennifer Grant0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Rattana Graff vs Julie Yi / Johanna Huck6-2, 6-2
2021-10-30vs STANFORD-CRA CW7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Cindy Raykiewicz vs Katherine Hwang / Annie Dang2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Tracy Leeds vs Dorita Castillano / Annarose Pamatmat6-0, 6-1
2021-10-02vs DIABLO CC CW7.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracy Leeds / Cindy Raykiewicz vs Laura Gallagher / Kelly McQueen6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathryn Hawkins / Stephanie Chamberlin vs Carrie Perino / Marni Godvin6-1, 6-3
2021-09-25vs GREENBROOK RS CW7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Hawkins / Karen Schumann vs Amy Burrill / Jennifer Perkins6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-18vs LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS CW7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathryn Hawkins / Margaret Harrison vs Margie Moran / Julieta Leong6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Margaret Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
3.93
Tracy Leeds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
3.52
Fran Hazell
published 4
3.36
3.34
Rattana Graff
published
3.23
Leda Lim
published
3.16
Dana Kruger
published 3.5
3.15
Cindy Raykiewicz
published 3.5
3.04
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
2.79
Karen Schumann
published
Karen Cardinal
published
Kathleen Gerhart
published
Kathryn Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Herman
published
Susan Tricca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Leeds + Margaret Harrison18760% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Raykiewicz + Dana Kruger134 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Hawkins + Margaret Harrison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Harrison
325W–140L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
Tracy Leeds
96W–40L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Adrienne Cummings
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Fran Hazell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.34
Leda Lim
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dana Kruger
9W–15L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Cindy Raykiewicz
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
Karen Schumann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
2.79
Karen Cardinal
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Gerhart
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathryn Hawkins
18W–38L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Herman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Tricca
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.