Teams

Elysium 1

2026 FALL A18&O WEEKEND · FALL 18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
MaryChris Williams
published
3.49
Heather Schumm
published 3.5
3.43
Christie Heinlen
published 3.5
3.40
Melissa Paull
published
3.39
Jessie Kremeier
published
3.39
Kim Keys
published
3.33
Mary Sampsel
published
3.30
Michele Tenhunfeld
published
3.24
Christine Berman
published 3.5
3.23
Janine Keeler
published
3.22
Casey Schreiber
published 3.5
3.14
Andrea Allison
published 3.5
3.11
Kristine Niemiec
published
3.06
Lynda Phlipot
published
2.94
Vicki Prescott
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
2.92
Kelly Ackert
usually #1 Singles 77%, also #2 Singles 12% · published
2.89
Jessica Kittrell
published
Nancy Rothacker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Paull + Jessie Kremeier5079% games+22.0% vs expected
Mary Sampsel + Christie Heinlen9063% games+9.3% vs expected
MaryChris Williams + Jessie Kremeier14167% games+7.5% vs expected
Michele Tenhunfeld + Christie Heinlen4557% games+6.7% vs expected
Mary Sampsel + Kim Keys4160% games+4.9% vs expected
Nancy Rothacker + Christie Heinlen8854% games+4.8% vs expected
Mary Sampsel + Michele Tenhunfeld5356% games+3.2% vs expected
Melissa Paull + MaryChris Williams8167% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MaryChris Williams
175W–102L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Heather Schumm
76W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Christie Heinlen
202W–84L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Melissa Paull
174W–71L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jessie Kremeier
122W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kim Keys
146W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Mary Sampsel
232W–115L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Michele Tenhunfeld
120W–84L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christine Berman
130W–83L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Janine Keeler
239W–121L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Casey Schreiber
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Andrea Allison
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Kristine Niemiec
122W–88L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lynda Phlipot
47W–25L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Vicki Prescott
89W–71L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
Kelly Ackert
265W–149L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Stephanie Stoflinsky
72W–40L career · no lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.89
Jessica Kittrell
81W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Rothacker
100W–74L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.