Teams

PiF LoCo- McKeel

2024 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Men · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-24vs Tiong - CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Shiller / Marc Sendich vs Chris Bokel / Benny Lam6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin McKeel / James Ruffin vs Blake Taylor / Keith Bown0-6, 2-6
2024-07-17vs Challengers- CumminsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarc Sendich / Thomas McCrary vs John Cummins / Scott Johnson6-7, 4-3
W#2 DoublesKevin McKeel / Brian Shiller vs David Teale / Albert Crenshaw6-1, 6-2
2024-07-09vs Melis - Loudoun LobstersLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas McCrary / Marc Sendich vs William Melis / Santhosh Potti2-6, 2-6
2024-06-27vs Cebulash - WHO IS WE?Won 10
W#1 DoublesEric Wachter / Brian Shiller vs Daniel Hong / Javed Ahmed6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-23vs Tiong - CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin McKeel / Ankur Jain vs Benny Lam / Scott Hataway5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRohit Munjal vs Tezcan Inanlar6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-19vs Challengers- CumminsWon 10
W#1 SinglesMarc Sendich vs Justin Garza6-4, 6-0
2024-06-04vs Melis - Loudoun LobstersLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Shiller / Eric Wachter vs Dante Paragas / Hung Le1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMarc Sendich vs James Herbert3-6, 3-6
2024-05-30vs Cebulash - WHO IS WE?Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin McKeel / John Williamson vs Suresh Murugan / Daniel Hong5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Marc Sendich
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
James Ruffin
published
3.31
Eric Wachter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Rohit Munjal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Kevin McKeel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Thomas McCrary
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Sendich + Thomas McCrary7850% games+5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marc Sendich
109W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
James Ruffin
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Eric Wachter
52W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Rohit Munjal
151W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Kevin McKeel
90W–97L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.12
Thomas McCrary
43W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.