Teams

KBTA (Festa)

2025 MIAMIDADE Social South Florida Women's Double Tennis L · Alpha 2

15 players · average NTRP 3.94 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-04-28vs Deering Bay (Porter)Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesSabine Zerarka / Cristina Simoes vs Karell Campbell / Ann Marie Robins4-6, 6-7
2025-03-18vs Ron Ehmann (Reyes)Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesAnne Edwards / Sabine Zerarka vs Penelope Johnson / Sara Cleveland7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-11vs TeamFormanLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesAna Lucia Aboitiz / Sabine Zerarka vs Emily Burrows / Monica Pardo5-7, 4-6
2025-02-11vs Miami Shores JockeysLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesSabine Zerarka / Ana Lucia Aboitiz vs NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA / Soraya Strouse6-7, 0-6
2025-01-28vs Coral Oaks (Glick)Split 11
W#2 Female DoublesKristina Andrews / Sabine Zerarka vs Linda Sarnia / Fran Sevcik1-2
L#5 Female DoublesAlison Houtte / Melissa Ribeiro da Cunha Pereira vs Lynn Prigozen / Elise Benkard1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-14vs The Ritz (deCamps)Split 11
W#4 Female DoublesCristina Greeven / Sabine Zerarka vs Patricia Baglietto / Carolina Herrera6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#5 Female DoublesDana Hamrick / Alison Houtte vs Maria Jose Dal Lago / Lucila Neuss2-6, 5-7
2024-12-03vs Dante Fascell (Wilner)Lost 01
L#2 Female DoublesKristina Andrews / Sabine Zerarka vs Carolyn Seckinger / Belinda Sime6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-19vs Riviera Country Club (Mas)Lost 01
L#4 Female DoublesSabine Zerarka / Cristina Greeven vs Elizabeth Schaul / Rebecca McCarron1-6, 6-7
2024-11-05vs Royal Palm (Pasko)Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesSabine Zerarka / Cristina Simoes vs Jennifer Levin / Rosy Bild7-5, 6-4
2024-10-29vs TeamFormanLost 01
L#4 Female DoublesKristina Andrews / Sabine Zerarka vs Amy Morrow / Jessica Patino6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-22vs Deering Bay (Porter)Won 20
W#3 Female DoublesSabine Zerarka / Kristina Andrews vs Kimberly Fenton / Audrey Martinez6-0, 6-1
W#4 Female DoublesAlison Houtte / Dana Hamrick vs Marla Ferreira / Corinne Kayal6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Alpha 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Gricel Boto Bernales
usually #3 Female Doubles 28%, also #1 Female Doubles 22% · published 4.5
Anne Edwards
published 4
3.74
Dana Hamrick
usually #4 Female Doubles 50%, also #5 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Sabine Zerarka
usually #3 Female Doubles 36%, also #2 Female Doubles 36% · published
3.63
Andrea Tavara
usually #1 Female Doubles 56%, also #5 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
3.62
Lynn Johnston
published
3.61
Susie Valls
usually #1 Female Doubles 64%, also #6 Female Doubles 14% · published 4
3.60
3.58
Kristina Andrews
published
3.43
Alison Houtte
usually #5 Female Doubles 67%, also #4 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Monica Roelandse
usually #6 Female Doubles 39%, also #4 Female Doubles 23% · published
3.24
Luisa Gutman
published
3.17
Dawn Kirles
usually #3 Female Doubles 43%, also #6 Female Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Roelandse + Melissa Ribeiro da Cunha Pereira2642% games+4.5% vs expected
Alison Houtte + Dana Hamrick8658% games+2.0% vs expected
Gricel Boto Bernales + Susie Valls16854% games−1.1% vs expected
Sabine Zerarka + Andrea Tavara3546% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Tavara + Susie Valls1440% gamesnot enough data
Monica Roelandse + Luisa Gutman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gricel Boto Bernales
343W–259L career · 16 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
4
Anne Edwards
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dana Hamrick
138W–156L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Sabine Zerarka
58W–72L career · 11 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Andrea Tavara
50W–69L career · 9 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Myriam Alvarez Scicolone
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Lynn Johnston
39W–52L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Susie Valls
118W–209L career · 14 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Ana Lucia Aboitiz
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Kristina Andrews
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Melissa Ribeiro da Cunha Pereira
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Alison Houtte
36W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Monica Roelandse
111W–112L career · 12 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Luisa Gutman
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Dawn Kirles
43W–51L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.