Teams

2 ACAC Hall

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 9.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-20vs 3 Salisbury Gruhl's FireballersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Cerny / Joyce Steed vs Christopher Corts / Laura Lafors6-1, 6-2
2022-10-30vs 3 Salisbury Gruhl's FireballersLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiego Marti Vertiz / Joyce Steed vs Dillon Sykes / Lauren Palmer5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJustin Cerny / Kim Alley vs Kelly Hunter / Mary Napier5-7, 1-6
2022-10-23vs 1 MAC WilliamsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiego Marti Vertiz / Joyce Steed vs Carol Gregory / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-4, 6-3
2022-10-22vs 1 MAC WilliamsWon 20
W#2 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Joanna Pfluger vs Ellen Meyer / Zachary King7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKim Alley / Justin Cerny vs Chuck Snow / Jennifer Grinnell7-5, 6-1
2022-10-09vs 3 Salisbury Gruhl's FireballersLost 02
L#2 DoublesMaka Lowenstein / Stuart Fulcher vs Patricia Villar Villar / Drew Lineberger3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNeil Perron / Kim Alley vs Nina Sjogren / Logan Gruhl1-6, 2-6
2022-09-17vs 1 MAC WilliamsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBen Hall / Joyce Steed vs Tamara Beck Jacquet / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-2, 6-4
2022-09-11vs 3 Salisbury Gruhl's FireballersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJoanna Pfluger / Stuart Fulcher vs Nina Sorkin / Drew Lineberger2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoyce Steed / Rosen Naydenov vs Suzanne Spiller / Albert Thomas6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Justin Cerny
published
4.72
4.36
Karolyn Hall
published 4.5
4.21
Joyce Steed
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.14
Stuart Fulcher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.11
Erin Waters
published 4.5
4.08
Maka Lowenstein
published
3.88
Kim Alley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Joanna Pfluger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joyce Steed + Stuart Fulcher4944% gamesnot enough data
Karolyn Hall + Stuart Fulcher5550% gamesnot enough data
Stuart Fulcher + Kim Alley2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Cerny
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.79
5
Diego Marti Vertiz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.72
4.5
Karolyn Hall
120W–68L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Joyce Steed
109W–108L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 9 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Erin Waters
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Maka Lowenstein
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
4.08
4.5
Kim Alley
126W–116L career · 3 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.88
Joanna Pfluger
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.