Teams

Mitchell/META

2025 Mixed 55 & over-META · 4.0 Senior Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-31vs Zhang55/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay McNabb / Rodger Acklin vs Emily Caveney / Daryl Addison6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNorman White / Ellan Kitzmiller vs Analida Alexay / Tim Stone6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanet Mitchell / Tim Smith vs Alice Zhang / Kelly Williams6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-20vs Zhang55/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesRodger Acklin / Gail Archer vs Alice Zhang / Jeffrey Miller6-7, 2-1
W#2 DoublesTim Smith / Ellan Kitzmiller vs Kimberly Keith / Daryl Addison6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarcia Sentell / David Sapp vs Tim Stone / Mary DiSantis6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-12vs Zhang55/METAWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Mitchell / Rodger Acklin vs Analida Alexay / Kelly Williams6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGail Archer / David Sapp vs Kimberly Keith / Fernando Subijana6-1, 7-5
2025-06-29vs Zhang55/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllan Kitzmiller / Rodger Acklin vs Mary DiSantis / David Reynolds6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanet Mitchell / Tim Smith vs Kimberly Keith / Fernando Subijana6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNorman White / Marcia Sentell vs Emily Caveney / Jeffrey Miller1-6, 2-6
2025-06-25vs Zhang55/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesGail Archer / Jim Green vs Daryl Addison / Alice Zhang3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Mitchell / Tim Smith vs Mary DiSantis / David Reynolds7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNorman White / Ellan Kitzmiller vs Analida Alexay / Jeffrey Miller0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Senior Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Ellan Kitzmiller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
David Sapp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Lindsay McNabb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Janet Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Marcia Sentell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Gail Archer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jim Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Norman White
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rodger Acklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ellan Kitzmiller
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
David Sapp
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay McNabb
36W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Janet Mitchell
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Marcia Sentell
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Gail Archer
13W–7L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Jim Green
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Norman White
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rodger Acklin
6W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.