Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Chytraus/Weeks

2024 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

11 players · average NTRP 2.57 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-19vs South Jordan-RoseSplit 11
W#1 SinglesStephanie Alpizar vs Katie Rose6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKimberly Chytraus / Amy Looney vs Blake Bohe / Christina Jones2-6, 2-6
2024-10-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-En FuegoLost 02
L#1 DoublesTiffany Rodriguez / Stephanie Alpizar vs Raquel Huamani / Teresa Hatter2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaddy Garrett / Katelyn Bradley vs Shelly Kaihatu / Alicia Miller3-6, 3-6
2024-10-05vs Liberty Park Tennis-WhitlockLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Wissler / Ali Love vs Aihan Ni / Van To1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Alpizar vs Ann Monroy3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Asay Keele / Amy Looney vs Jean Whitlock / Laura Hughes0-6, 2-6
2024-09-28vs Sports Mall-Team FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Chytraus / Heather Wissler vs Olivia Moreton / Annie Mortensen3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Rodriguez / Maddy Garrett vs Hailey Jensen / Madison Milligan2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesStephanie Alpizar / Kimberly Chytraus vs Kelly Singer / Diana Vogel3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Fletcher / Amy Asay Keele vs Pat Williams / Lynn Fuller2-6, 4-6
2024-09-14vs South Jordan-RoseLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Chytraus / Katelyn Bradley vs Rebecca Myers / Sarah McMillan0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Fletcher vs Christina Jones0-6, 0-2
W#2 DoublesHeather Wissler / Amy Looney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-07vs Liberty Park Tennis-En FuegoLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandy Weeks / Kimberly Chytraus vs Mindy Wilson / Lynn Hepperly6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTiffany Rodriguez vs Raquel Huamani0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaddy Garrett / Katelyn Bradley vs Alicia Miller / Krisann Humphreys1-6, 2-6
2024-08-26vs Liberty Park Tennis-WhitlockLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Rodriguez / Maddy Garrett vs Jenna DeLong / Susan Heap6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesStephanie Alpizar vs Laura Hughes6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeather Wissler / Angela Fletcher vs Sabrina Vienneau / Rayna Lofgren1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Sandy Weeks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.50
Ali Love
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Amy Asay Keele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Amy Looney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Katelyn Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.13
Kimberly Chytraus
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.10
Angela Fletcher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.07
Heather Wissler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Tiffany Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Maddy Garrett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Stephanie Alpizar
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ali Love + Sandy Weeks6353% games+12.8% vs expected
Kimberly Chytraus + Sandy Weeks7748% games+11.4% vs expected
Kimberly Chytraus + Heather Wissler2932% games−9.6% vs expected
Ali Love + Kimberly Chytraus314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Chytraus + Angela Fletcher224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Chytraus + Stephanie Alpizar134 matchesnot enough data
Heather Wissler + Angela Fletcher224 matchesnot enough data
Maddy Garrett + Tiffany Rodriguez134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sandy Weeks
67W–61L career · 9 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Ali Love
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%48%52%
2.50
2.5
Amy Asay Keele
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Amy Looney
3W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katelyn Bradley
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Kimberly Chytraus
26W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Angela Fletcher
14W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Heather Wissler
17W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Tiffany Rodriguez
10W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Maddy Garrett
5W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Alpizar
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.