Teams

Quail/Southerly

2025 IRMSL Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women Sat

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-22vs Boulevard/Rally Cats-BlandoWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Lynn Southerly vs Sue Davis / Jackie Blyth6-3, 6-4
2025-03-15vs IRMSL/Cummings/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Holly Steele vs Pamela Houri / Lori Glaspey6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-01vs Boulevard/Rally Cats-BlandoWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynn Southerly / Stacy Hockenhull vs Wendy Orthober / Catherine Spahr6-1, 6-2
2025-02-15vs Nrs/PillariLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Debbie Bochte vs Brenda Gimpl / Ann Chauss4-6, 2-6
2025-02-08vs Boulevard/Rally Cats-BlandoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebbie Bochte / Lynn Southerly vs Katie Winslow / Mary Bowman6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Fennell / Debbie Barnes vs Julie Hofmeister / Carol Kelly7-6, 6-1
2025-02-04vs IRMSL/Cummings/55&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Hockenhull / Mary Lunn vs Dina Cummings / Elisabeth Smith5-7, 2-6
2025-01-25vs Nrs/PillariLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather MacIntyre / Tiffani Buckley vs Carolyn Strong / Ann Chauss1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women Sat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Holly Steele
published
3.74
Allison Ritter
published 4
3.74
Mary Lunn
published
3.60
Stacy Hockenhull
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Lynn Southerly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Debbie Bochte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Kathy Fennell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Heather MacIntyre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Debbie Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Tiffani Buckley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather MacIntyre + Stacy Hockenhull4944% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Southerly + Allison Ritter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Steele
53W–34L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Allison Ritter
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Mary Lunn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Stacy Hockenhull
48W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Lynn Southerly
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Debbie Bochte
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Kathy Fennell
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Heather MacIntyre
39W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
4
Debbie Barnes
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
Tiffani Buckley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.