Teams

CRRC-Johnson/Follen

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 5.0 Mixed

4 players · average NTRP 2.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Roxanna Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Victor ILAU
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
ROSS GREEN
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Results4 ties
2024-12-07Split 11
L#1 DoublesRoxanna Johnson / ROSS GREEN vs Dorothy Shin / Paul Choi6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Poetsch / Victor ILAU vs Saerom Kim / Jungjoo Lee2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-20Split 11
L#2 DoublesAnca Ilau / Victor ILAU vs Xiaobo Dai / Craig Tompkins5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesROSS GREEN / Sidney Clarke vs Brenda Elliott / George Papasouliotis6-0, 6-3
2024-10-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnca Ilau / Victor ILAU vs Allie van Nostran / Parsa Taghizadeh6-3, 6-3
2024-09-07Split 11
L#1 DoublesVictor ILAU / Anca Ilau vs Grainne Koeberl / Patrick Koeberl6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRoxanna Johnson / ROSS GREEN vs Denise Butchee / Bishnu Patra6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Roxanna Johnson
114W–65L career
0%98%2%
2.86
2.5
Victor ILAU
20W–16L career
0%3%97%
2.70
3
Jacqueline Babb Milligan
35W–63L career
6%94%0%
2.69
2.5
ROSS GREEN
11W–33L career
0%93%7%
2.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.