Teams

SFT:Spark Blue:Sideman

2026 EMA Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.75 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs SFT:Banana:Crabtree/DoriaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJolee Imrie / Andrew Imrie vs Hayley Doria / Reilly O'Brien6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Bradley / Gretta Hartman vs Marybeth Liang / Matti Teittinen2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Roeper / Thomas Arnold vs Carolynn Crabtree / Thomas Lomenzo4-6, 2-6
2026-04-26vs SFT:Spark Green:SidemanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesThomas Arnold / Emily Roeper vs Charles Robertson / Alexandra Warren4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Woolston / Gretta Hartman vs Hanul Moon / Grace Messina2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-19vs CED:Cedardale:AdamonisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Imrie / Jolee Imrie vs Ryan Adamonis / Kathryn Casaletto4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesGretta Hartman / Scott Bradley vs Alexandre Uttard / Andrea Wegner6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSally Woolston / Benjamin Woolston vs Mary Carroll / John Indrisano3-6, 2-6
2026-03-22vs WOB:Woburn Green;WilleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJolee Imrie / Andrew Imrie vs Marion Forcet / Jedidiah Glass6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGretta Hartman / Samuel Kluger vs Jillian Winer / YOUSEF ASAAD2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Roeper / Thomas Arnold vs Sandra Allen / Ben Guth4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs SFT:Spark Green:SidemanWon 20
W#1 DoublesJolee Imrie / Andrew Imrie vs Mckinley Grimes / Alexandra Warren6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Elmer / Emily Roeper vs Anne Wilks / Harrison Max3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-22vs SFT:Banana:Crabtree/DoriaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJolee Imrie / Andrew Imrie vs Hayley Doria / Reilly O'Brien2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJanel Bhattacharya / Samuel Kluger vs Dana Bacalla / Matti Teittinen4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSally Woolston / Benjamin Woolston vs Michelle Liang / Darius Paradie5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-08vs CED:Cedardale:AdamonisLost 03
L#1 DoublesSally Woolston / Benjamin Woolston vs Alexandre Uttard / Andrea Wegner4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Arnold / Janel Bhattacharya vs Lisa L'italien / Ryan Adamonis6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGretta Hartman / Scott Bradley vs Lisa Tholen / Andrew Nguyen2-6, 2-6
2026-01-11vs WOB:Woburn Green;WilleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Woolston / Emily Roeper vs YOUSEF ASAAD / Laura Oberlander3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSamuel Kluger / Sally Woolston vs Daniel Alexander / Amanda Kaplan7-6, 6-6
L#3 DoublesScott Bradley / Janel Bhattacharya vs Marion Forcet / Michael O'Connor1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
Andrew Imrie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.45
Evan Sideman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.25
Samuel Kluger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Gretta Hartman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.16
Benjamin Woolston
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Scott Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Emily Roeper
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.01
Janel Bhattacharya
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Michael Elmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jolee Imrie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Woolston
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Woolston + Benjamin Woolston2443% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Imrie + Jolee Imrie3248% gamesnot enough data
Emily Roeper + Thomas Arnold044 matchesnot enough data
Gretta Hartman + Scott Bradley033 matchesnot enough data
Emily Roeper + Evan Sideman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrew Imrie
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.87
Evan Sideman
75W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
Samuel Kluger
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Gretta Hartman
25W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Benjamin Woolston
26W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
Scott Bradley
28W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
Emily Roeper
9W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.04
Janel Bhattacharya
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Michael Elmer
44W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.97
Jolee Imrie
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Woolston
102W–59L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Arnold
19W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.