Teams

Sportime

2024 Tri Level Men · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-10vs HenningLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackson Regan / Scott Hefley vs Rajesh Padmanabhan / David Wells7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEvan Adelstein / Kevin Lau vs Matt Henning / Connor Morelli3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Bellcourt / Maxwell DeCusatis vs Shivasankar Karuppaiah / John Powell4-6, 0-6
2024-03-03vs Northern: SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesJackson Regan / Chris Hanley vs Roberto Paladini / Jesse McGuire1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Lau / Aidar Gosmanov vs Gregory Roe / Brent Smith2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGerard DeCusatis / Prince Karimalikal vs Anton Keller / Bryant Jarocki6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-02-18vs HenningWon 21
L#1 DoublesScott Hefley / Chris Hanley vs Rajesh Padmanabhan / David Wells1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAidar Gosmanov / IMRAN SHAH vs Matt Henning / Ryan Luna6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPrince Karimalikal / Luc Belikis vs Chris Bragg / Thomas Miller5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-11vs Northern: AmicoLost 02
L#2 DoublesEvan Adelstein / IMRAN SHAH vs Jeffrey Denney / Mark van Leuven2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLuc Belikis / Daniel Bellcourt vs Justin Tram / Logan Tichenor1-6, 0-6
2024-01-28vs HenningWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Warren / Scott Hefley vs Rajesh Padmanabhan / David Wells1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesIMRAN SHAH / Evan Adelstein vs Ryan Luna / Connor Morelli1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGerard DeCusatis / Maxwell DeCusatis vs John Powell / Thomas Miller6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-01-20vs Northern: SmithLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Hanley / Ali Albaker vs Andreas P. Christodoulou / Carter Flanigan3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAidar Gosmanov / IMRAN SHAH vs Mark van Leuven / Gregory Roe1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Bellcourt / Gerard DeCusatis vs Bryant Jarocki / Logan Tichenor1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Smith6014410103
2Sportime2461230205
3Henning1571126179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jackson Regan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Ali Albaker
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.66
Chris Hanley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Scott Hefley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Prince Karimalikal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Aidar Gosmanov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
IMRAN SHAH
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Peter Green
published
2.83
Luc Belikis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Bellcourt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Gerard DeCusatis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Evan Adelstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Lau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maxwell DeCusatis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerard DeCusatis + Maxwell DeCusatis7943% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackson Regan
14W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Ali Albaker
45W–46L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Chris Hanley
50W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Scott Hefley
14W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Prince Karimalikal
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.37
3.5
Aidar Gosmanov
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
IMRAN SHAH
67W–92L career · 6 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Peter Green
6W–30L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Luc Belikis
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Daniel Bellcourt
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gerard DeCusatis
13W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
Evan Adelstein
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Lau
25W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maxwell DeCusatis
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.