Teams

Melis - Loudoun Lobsters

2024 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Men · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-21vs Cebulash - WHO IS WE?Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPraveen Mullacherry / Santhosh Potti vs Mike Ly / Daniel Hong2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDante Paragas / Chris Panagides vs Jeffrey Gill / Javed Ahmed4-6, 0-6
2024-07-18vs Tiong - CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesPraveen Mullacherry / Santhosh Potti vs Rishi Malhotra / Brian Partlow1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDante Paragas / Michael Dunn vs Benny Lam / Vijay Kalanadhabhatta2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-14vs Challengers- CumminsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDante Paragas / Praveen Mullacherry vs Justin Garza / David Teale6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSanthosh Potti / William Melis vs Thomas Linn / Manish Saboo6-2, 6-2
2024-07-09vs PiF LoCo- McKeelWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Melis / Santhosh Potti vs Thomas McCrary / Marc Sendich6-2, 6-2
2024-06-23vs Cebulash - WHO IS WE?Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSanthosh Potti / Hung Le vs Mike Ly / Daniel Hong2-6, 2-6
2024-06-20vs Tiong - CourtmastersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDante Paragas / James Herbert vs Rishi Malhotra / Vijay Kalanadhabhatta6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPraveen Mullacherry / Santhosh Potti vs Scott Hataway / Benny Lam5-7, 6-4
2024-06-14vs Challengers- CumminsWon 20
W#1 DoublesArturo Garcia Alonso / Praveen Mullacherry vs Manish Saboo / Jeff Bolyard6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHung Le / Santhosh Potti vs David Teale / Allen Amir Parvizian6-0, 6-0
2024-06-04vs PiF LoCo- McKeelWon 10
W#1 DoublesDante Paragas / Hung Le vs Brian Shiller / Eric Wachter6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
James Herbert
published 4
3.81
Santhosh Potti
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.41
Hung Le
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Dante Paragas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Arturo Garcia Alonso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Michael Dunn
published
Kursat Yavuz
published
Praveen Mullacherry
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Herbert
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Santhosh Potti
41W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.81
3.5
Hung Le
44W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Dante Paragas
72W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Arturo Garcia Alonso
77W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
Michael Dunn
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Kursat Yavuz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Praveen Mullacherry
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.