Teams

B:NHH: 3.5 Fireballs:Gershfeld

2024 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women 1

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesMarie Crane / Susan Griffiths vs Nicole Kaya / Jamie Stasko0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLiz van Leer vs Andrea Fleischman4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Brooks / Jeanne Stracener vs Nadine Morandi / Samantha Cooper6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSheila Cimmino / Svetlana Gershfeld vs Wanling Zhu / Jennifer Myatt3-6, 6-7
2024-01-21vs B:GF:Namaste at the Net:RosecransLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan Griffiths / Marie Crane vs Lisa MacKay / Kate Piironen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Ryder vs Jill Fried7-5, 5-7
L#2 DoublesClaudelle Natividad Le / Linda Sadinsky vs Laura LaCascia-Ehlert / Kristen Rosecrans2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJudith Marlow / Heidi Brooks vs Eleanor Tandler / Leanne Jolin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-14vs A:LS:Dematteo's Diva's:DematteoWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanne Stracener / Liz van Leer vs Camille Burlingham / Beth Pye6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarie Crane / Susan Griffiths vs Andrea Bilskis / Anne Luner6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarol Evans / Linda Sadinsky vs Kim de Matteo / Keelin Hurtt7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLiz van Leer / Sheila Cimmino vs Juliette Fumex / Jacqui Mullally6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesWhitney Vitale vs Michelle Belcourt3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarie Crane / Susan Griffiths vs Alison Wehrle / Kathleen Speer6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesClaudelle Natividad Le / Linda Sadinsky vs Marta Elmasry / Barbara Doran3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-12-09vs A:MIS:3.5W 18&:Nolan/DingWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Griffiths / Marie Crane vs Sarah Steverman / Diann Cote6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLiz van Leer vs Ding Ding7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRita King / Carol Evans vs Mia Nolan / Monica Collins6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLinda Sadinsky / Lillian Garcia vs Amy Baumann / Patricia Conway2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesLiz van Leer / Sheila Cimmino vs Laura King / Liesl Purviance5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWhitney Vitale vs Samantha Cooper6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Griffiths / Marie Crane vs Christina Ruenhorst / Nelida Reyes-Matos6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeanne Stracener / Judith Marlow vs Wanling Zhu / Jennifer Myatt7-6, 5-3
W#1 DoublesLiz van Leer / Sheila Cimmino vs Jennifer Brant / Juliette Fumex6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Ryder vs Michelle Belcourt3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Evans / Judith Marlow vs Patricia Goldfeder / Alison Randall3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Griffiths / Claudelle Natividad Le vs Kathleen Imbergamo / Patsy Metcalf1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMartha Royston / Meredith DelVecchio vs Valerie Libert / Heather Bancroft-Hunt6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLiz van Leer vs Meghan Trausch6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSheila Cimmino / Marie Crane vs MaryBeth Giles / Carolyn Katz5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSvetlana Gershfeld / Jeanne Stracener vs Grace Degrooth / Alexandra Bates7-5, 6-1
2023-10-14vs B:GF:Namaste at the Net:RosecransWon 31
W#1 DoublesMartha Royston / Meredith DelVecchio vs Leslie Palumbo / Kristen Rosecrans6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSheila Cimmino vs Maureen Goodrich2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLiz van Leer / Jeanne Stracener vs Susan Dellenbaugh / Tanya Flynn6-4, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRita King / Claudelle Natividad Le vs Toni Rivera / Linda Sachs6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A:OSB:The Diamond Dogs:Trausch/Libert08161635267
2A:LS:Dematteo's Diva's:Dematteo08171539316
3A:MIS:3.5W 18&:Nolan/Ding0882450343
4B:NHH: 3.5 Fireballs:Gershfeld09231132301
5B:MAD:3.5W Madrackets:Goldfeder/Palmer09201637303
6B:GF:Namaste at the Net:Rosecrans09171742348
7B:MIL:Mid Court Crisis:Orban/Reyes-Matos09171945351

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jeanne Stracener
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Liz van Leer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
3.31
Sheila Cimmino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.31
Susan Griffiths
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.30
Heidi Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Marie Crane
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.20
Rita King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Emily Ryder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Claudelle Natividad Le
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Judith Marlow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Carol Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Lillian Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Amy Luisi
published 3.5
2.85
Linda Sadinsky
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Svetlana Gershfeld
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Martha Royston
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Meghan Knight
published
Meredith DelVecchio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Whitney Vitale
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Griffiths + Liz van Leer8456% games+12.2% vs expected
Susan Griffiths + Marie Crane13459% games+8.0% vs expected
Sheila Cimmino + Liz van Leer16953% games+5.5% vs expected
Liz van Leer + Jeanne Stracener6257% games+4.6% vs expected
Susan Griffiths + Jeanne Stracener4352% games+2.9% vs expected
Sheila Cimmino + Claudelle Natividad Le5161% games+2.4% vs expected
Sheila Cimmino + Martha Royston4356% games+2.1% vs expected
Claudelle Natividad Le + Svetlana Gershfeld3348% games+1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeanne Stracener
49W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.33
Liz van Leer
72W–54L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
Sheila Cimmino
53W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Susan Griffiths
100W–90L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Heidi Brooks
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Marie Crane
30W–16L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Rita King
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Emily Ryder
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Claudelle Natividad Le
59W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Judith Marlow
35W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Carol Evans
56W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
Lillian Garcia
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.96
3.5
Amy Luisi
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
Linda Sadinsky
20W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.85
Svetlana Gershfeld
64W–70L career · 8 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.85
Martha Royston
15W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meghan Knight
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meredith DelVecchio
33W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Whitney Vitale
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.