Teams

Barker's Landing - FOB

*2025 Houston Fall League (2024) NA - Sunday Mixed Doubles · 8.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-03vs Plaza Oaks - GladiatorsLost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Young / Yoenhee Park vs Scott Bonds / Marty Kirkpatrick2-6, 4-6
2024-10-27vs Cinco Ranch West - Match PointLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Young / Yvonne Puente vs Miao Zhang / KANGKANG ZHOU6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-20vs Cross Creek - Got MixedWon 10
W#4 DoublesDaniel Young / Lindsey Upton vs Lee Pena / Lyne Belliveau6-4, 6-1
2024-09-22vs Cinco Ranch West - Match PointWon 10
W#4 DoublesDaniel Young / Emma Haywood vs Lei He / He Liu6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Cayleigh Simpson
published 4.5
4.12
David Yang
published 4.5
4.03
Bach Nghiem
published 4
4.02
Vivian Huang
published
3.83
XUN ZHAI
published
3.76
Lindsey Upton
published
3.67
Marco Antonio
published
3.66
Alan Lee
published 4
3.66
Patrick Chou
published
3.63
Emily Warnecke
published 3.5
3.59
Daniel Young
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Yvonne Puente
published
3.43
Emma Haywood
published 3.5
Yoenhee Park
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yvonne Puente + Alan Lee4255% games−1.7% vs expected
Vivian Huang + Alan Lee4255% games−3.1% vs expected
Cayleigh Simpson + Patrick Chou6163% gamesnot enough data
Yvonne Puente + David Yang224 matchesnot enough data
David Yang + Emily Warnecke314 matchesnot enough data
Vivian Huang + Bach Nghiem314 matchesnot enough data
Emily Warnecke + Marco Antonio224 matchesnot enough data
David Yang + Emma Haywood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cayleigh Simpson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
David Yang
27W–20L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Bach Nghiem
46W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
Vivian Huang
110W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
XUN ZHAI
35W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Lindsey Upton
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.76
Marco Antonio
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.67
4
Alan Lee
55W–33L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Patrick Chou
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Emily Warnecke
57W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
4
Daniel Young
33W–49L career · type S · 8 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Yvonne Puente
118W–68L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Emma Haywood
36W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
Yoenhee Park
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.