Teams

WI Adult 65 & over 8.0 Hart Park Russell

2022 WI Adult 65 & Over · WI Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-08-26vs WI Adult 65 & over 8.0 MALT CrumpLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaurice Russell / Rick O'Connor vs Peter Crump / Tom Turner9-10
2022-08-26vs WI Adult 65 & over 8.0 MALT CrumpWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeorge Kopacz / C H vs Karl Nissler / Tom Turner10-1
2022-08-05vs WI Adult 65 & over 8.0 MALT CrumpWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorge Kopacz / David Ellis vs Tom Turner / Sid Ballweg9-1
W#2 DoublesJames Siegel / Ronald Haidinger vs Peter Crump / C H10-5
W#3 DoublesPaul S Hoff / Butch Loofboro vs Frank Hilscher / James Halberg10-3
2022-08-05vs WI Adult 65 & over 8.0 MALT CrumpWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul S Hoff / Butch Loofboro vs Peter Crump / Tom Turner10-9
W#2 DoublesMaurice Russell / Rick O'Connor vs Sid Ballweg / James Halberg10-3
W#3 DoublesJames Siegel / Ronald Haidinger vs Frank Hilscher / Karl Nissler10-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Butch Loofboro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Maurice Russell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
George Kopacz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.23
Ronald Haidinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
James Siegel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paul S Hoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rick O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Butch Loofboro + George Kopacz2449% gamesnot enough data
Butch Loofboro + Maurice Russell303 matchesnot enough data
Butch Loofboro + Paul S Hoff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Butch Loofboro
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maurice Russell
55W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
George Kopacz
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
Ronald Haidinger
24W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
James Siegel
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul S Hoff
14W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick O'Connor
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.