Teams

PCRK ORANGE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-05vs CP GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Conroy / Ryan Beckstrom vs Hector Trevino / Matthew Bruff7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJosh Dougan vs Felipe Quiroga6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Whipple / Chris Whipple vs Jose Amador / Andy Duncan4-6, 5-7
2024-08-15vs CP REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Beckstrom / Paul Jaszewski vs Case Anderson / Daniel Greer6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJosh Dougan vs John Kelleher6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPaul Whipple / Chris Whipple vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-08vs LEBTC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesJosh Dougan / Ryan Beckstrom vs Tony Gerome / Brian Inglis6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Whipple / Ryan Schellpeper vs Hernan Mendez / Randy Skalla7-6, 6-4
2024-08-01vs GAC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Whipple / Josh Dougan vs Jacob Toffler / Matthew Warnicke7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-25vs ATC BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Beckstrom / Ryan Schellpeper vs Robert Brown / Jon Bathgate3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Paul Whipple
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.41
Daniel Conroy
published 4.5
4.41
Josh Dougan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
Ryan Beckstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Eric Stromberg
published 4.5
4.08
Scott Justus
published
4.06
Chris Whipple
published 4.5
3.86
Paul Jaszewski
published
Ryan Schellpeper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Conroy + Josh Dougan8067% games+8.4% vs expected
Paul Whipple + Chris Whipple5159% games+3.2% vs expected
Eric Stromberg + Ryan Beckstrom5259% gamesnot enough data
Paul Whipple + Josh Dougan303 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Beckstrom + Ryan Schellpeper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Paul Whipple
162W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
4.48
4.5
Daniel Conroy
22W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
4.41
4.5
Josh Dougan
95W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Ryan Beckstrom
52W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
4.37
4.5
Eric Stromberg
105W–48L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Justus
17W–21L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Chris Whipple
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
Paul Jaszewski
33W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
Ryan Schellpeper
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.