Teams

BERKELEY TC 55AM7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-19vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS 55AM7.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesArthur Anglin / Chris Ertel vs Mark Morissette / Keith Ma2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGary Wayne / Mark Brilliant vs Tom Januario / Lonnie Fogg7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-15vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS 55AM7.0AWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeung Hyun / Gregory Leon vs David Kardon / ALEX S WHANG7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMark Brilliant / Gary Wayne vs Keith Ma / Mark Morissette6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Ertel / Alexis Papahadjopoulos vs Alan Wong / Daniel Chin7-6, 6-4
2025-03-30vs LANEY TA/Encinal HS 55AM7.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesGary Wayne / Mark Brilliant vs Andreas Berner / ALEX S WHANG6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Barsky / Alexis Papahadjopoulos vs Mark Abzug / Tom Januario6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteven Cohen / Walter Garms vs Bill Anderson / Gary Fries2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Chris Ertel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Alexis Papahadjopoulos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Jeung Hyun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Gregory Leon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
John Barsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Ash Huang
published 3.5
3.13
Mark Brilliant
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Gary Wayne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Tim Wedlake
published
Arthur Anglin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Holden Hume
published 3
Oliver Wright
published
Walter Garms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Wayne + Mark Brilliant1450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Ertel
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Alexis Papahadjopoulos
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Jeung Hyun
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Gregory Leon
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
John Barsky
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ash Huang
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Mark Brilliant
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Gary Wayne
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Tim Wedlake
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Arthur Anglin
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Holden Hume
7W–21L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Oliver Wright
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Walter Garms
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.