Teams

5WESS-Schepper 30 MEN SINGLES F3

2025 cSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 3.0 & 2.5 FALL SINGLES SEM

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-13vs 4FAC-Finkelberg 30 MEN SINGLES F3Lost 12
W#1 SinglesNoah Casser vs Warren Brasch6-3, 3-0
L#2 SinglesChristian Ibanez vs Michael Fleischer3-6, 4-5
L#3 SinglesJason Wilkinson vs Eric Nicolson6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-11-22vs 3EAST-Froggett 30 MEN SINGLES F3Won 21
W#1 SinglesRanadeb Chaudhuri vs Martin Tylenda7-6, 2-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChristian Ibanez vs Howard Barrons3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMike Dorocak vs Billy Schaber7-5, 3-5
2025-11-15vs 1EAST-Kwiecinski 30 MEN SINGLES F3Split 11
W#1 SinglesRanadeb Chaudhuri vs Alex Pepin6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJason Wilkinson vs Sean Kenyon3-6, 6-4
2025-11-08vs 2EAST-Horn 30 MEN SINGLES F3Lost 12
L#1 SinglesChristian Ibanez vs Ronald Perkins1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJorge Jurado vs NICHOLAS JOHNSON6-7, 1-1
W#3 SinglesJason Wilkinson vs Mark Horn6-3, 6-1
2025-11-01vs 4FAC-Finkelberg 30 MEN SINGLES F3Lost 12
L#1 SinglesChristian Ibanez vs Vick Kheny1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWilliam Strachan vs Joshua Jacobs1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMike Dorocak vs Nathan Gudritz6-2, 6-4
2025-10-18vs 3EAST-Froggett 30 MEN SINGLES F3Lost 03
L#1 SinglesChristian Ibanez vs Howard Barrons2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNoah Casser vs Billy Schaber5-7, 3-4
L#3 SinglesSouheil Saba vs Jeffrey Froggett1-6, 6-5
L#1 SinglesChristian Ibanez vs Alex Pepin6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRanadeb Chaudhuri vs Jackey Chen6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJorge Jurado vs Nolan Tillis6-2, 6-3
2025-10-04vs 2EAST-Horn 30 MEN SINGLES F3Won 30
W#1 SinglesChristian Ibanez vs Ronald Perkins6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMike Dorocak vs Abid Hossain6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJason Wilkinson vs Benjamin Engelhardt6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · MEN 3.0 & 2.5 FALL SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14FAC-Finkelberg 30 MEN SINGLES F38020410135
21LIB-Atkinson 30 MEN SINGLES F18222818173
32FAC- Weiss 30 MEN SINGLES F17321917166
44FAC-Fitzpatrick 30 MEN SINGLES F173181226224
53FAC-Mellem 30 MEN SINGLES F26115612122
63EAST-Froggett 30 MEN SINGLES F35315922202
73CHIP-Dickerman 30 MEN SINGLES F155141634267
85EAST-Bonventre 30 MEN SINGLES F24312918159
96EAST-Dildy 30 MEN SINGLES F23491226185
105WESS-Schepper 30 MEN SINGLES F335111324196
115LIB-Reynolds 30 MEN SINGLES F137102043289
124TROY-Walter 30 MEN SINGLES F22581325191
131EAST-Kwiecinski 30 MEN SINGLES F32681635233
142EAST-Horn 30 MEN SINGLES F32661837254
151WESS-Moran 30 MEN SINGLES SEM F20411121128
166FAC-Taylor 30 MEN SINGLES F101052549313

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Ranadeb Chaudhuri
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.94
Michel AlKhalil
published
2.88
Souheil Saba
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Noah Casser
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.81
Mike Dorocak
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.81
Christian Ibanez
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
Andy Schepper
published 3
2.68
Jorge Jurado
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.57
Jason Wilkinson
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
William Strachan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Schepper + Mike Dorocak3450% gamesnot enough data
Jason Wilkinson + Andy Schepper4263% gamesnot enough data
Souheil Saba + Mike Dorocak134 matchesnot enough data
Jason Wilkinson + Mike Dorocak213 matchesnot enough data
Jason Wilkinson + Michel AlKhalil123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ranadeb Chaudhuri
35W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Michel AlKhalil
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Souheil Saba
84W–86L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Noah Casser
33W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Mike Dorocak
52W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Christian Ibanez
21W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Andy Schepper
34W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jorge Jurado
20W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Jason Wilkinson
32W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
William Strachan
38W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.