Teams

OC Dana Hills TC - Devon

2023 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekday

18 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-04vs OC NBTC - DonnaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Bo / Maria O'Connor vs Karen Comstock / Jill Purcell-Rogers6-2, 6-1
2023-07-28vs OC LLW Los Cab - Nicole 10amLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria O'Connor / Julie Bo vs Karen Char / Danielle D'Amico1-6, 5-7
2023-07-14vs OC NBTC - DonnaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Faunce / Stacy Ison vs Jill Purcell-Rogers / Karen Comstock4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Julie Bo
published
4.25
Maria O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Tristen Nugent
published 4.5
4.11
Devon Hogue
published 4
3.80
Lyndsay Boberg
published
3.77
Amy Berk
published 4
3.69
Carrie Anderson
published 4
3.59
Jenny Tetley
published
3.57
Jodi Mitchell
published
3.57
Michelle Haghani
published
3.55
Stacy Ison
published
3.52
Libby Perry
published
3.50
Kelly Dishno
published
3.47
3.19
Heather Bishoff
published
Lori Faunce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Reimers
published
Tracy Brennan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Bishoff + Jodi Mitchell2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Bo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Maria O'Connor
48W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Tristen Nugent
74W–60L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Devon Hogue
73W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
4.11
Lyndsay Boberg
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.80
4
Amy Berk
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Carrie Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Jenny Tetley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.59
Jodi Mitchell
21W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
Michelle Haghani
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Stacy Ison
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Libby Perry
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.52
Kelly Dishno
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
4
Dara Luangpraseut
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Heather Bishoff
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Lori Faunce
41W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lori Reimers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Brennan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.