Teams

STAC-Stedham-Underwood Orphans

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.89 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-07vs KTAC-Fulkerson-Tie BreakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Stedham / Lori Denton vs Leslie Engelhard / Mimi Gustavson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNachiko Yamamoto / Jill Tokarczyk vs Kay Hrdina / Iris Martin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Hawthorne / Jan Bradshaw vs Karen Fossum / Deanna Brown6-7, 1-6
2025-11-30Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Lakey / Lori Denton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNachiko Yamamoto / Jan Bradshaw vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTrudi Pomeroy / Kimberly Karnofski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-23vs VAC-Atkison/Peters-Volley GirlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Stedham / Heidi Lakey vs Tristan Wise / Julie Nierenberg4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJan Bradshaw / Laura Hawthorne vs Sandy Howard / Suzana Bulatovic3-6, 3-6
2025-11-16vs TLTC-Smith-Game Set Match-ure!Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnne Marie Stedham / Heidi Lakey vs Diane Kelley / Carolin Fast6-7, 3-5
L#2 DoublesLori Denton / Kimberly Karnofski vs Marit Berg / Julie Templin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Hawthorne / Jill Tokarczyk vs Anne Bennett / Lucy Davis1-6, 1-6
2025-11-01vs SWW-JTC-VanDerscheldenLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Stedham / Trudi Pomeroy vs Emalee Cardwell / Laura Jones0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Tokarczyk / Laura Hawthorne vs Chris Stewart / Loreal ARGYLE1-6, 0-6
2025-10-12vs VAC-Atkison/Peters-Volley GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Stedham / Heidi Lakey vs Felicity Womer / Julie Peters6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Karnofski / Lori Denton vs Cheryl Selby / Susan Mazikowski6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs KTAC-Fulkerson-Tie BreakersWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Marie Stedham / Heidi Lakey vs Barbara Floro / Cristina Mejia6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNachiko Yamamoto / Kimberly Karnofski vs Kay Hrdina / Iris Martin6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Arceo / Trudi Pomeroy vs Katrina Fulkerson / Charmaine Leicht6-2, 6-4
2025-09-14vs SWW-JTC-VanDerscheldenLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Arceo / Nachiko Yamamoto vs Debbie Dymarkowski / Nadine Johnson Rice2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Karnofski / Jill Tokarczyk vs Emalee Cardwell / Laura Jones1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Hawthorne / Trudi Pomeroy vs Chris Stewart / Casey Hunter3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Arceo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Nachiko Yamamoto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Heidi Lakey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Jan Bradshaw
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Anne Marie Stedham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Lori Denton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Jill Tokarczyk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.30
Trudi Pomeroy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Liana Angove-Sowa
published 2.5
2.12
Laura Hawthorne
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Kimberly Karnofski
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Bradshaw + Laura Hawthorne5453% games+4.6% vs expected
Heidi Lakey + Anne Marie Stedham4542% games+0.9% vs expected
Nachiko Yamamoto + Anne Marie Stedham3543% games+0.3% vs expected
Liana Angove-Sowa + Anne Marie Stedham121649% games−0.8% vs expected
Christine Arceo + Anne Marie Stedham1632% games−2.4% vs expected
Lori Denton + Anne Marie Stedham41937% games−5.0% vs expected
Jan Bradshaw + Nachiko Yamamoto1538% games−10.1% vs expected
Lori Denton + Trudi Pomeroy1529% games−12.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christine Arceo
7W–31L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Nachiko Yamamoto
11W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Heidi Lakey
34W–89L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.63
3
Jan Bradshaw
33W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Anne Marie Stedham
34W–78L career · 6 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43
3
Lori Denton
19W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
3
Jill Tokarczyk
37W–50L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.34
Trudi Pomeroy
2W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.30
2.5
Liana Angove-Sowa
22W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Laura Hawthorne
18W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Kimberly Karnofski
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.