Teams

Okoh-Tisch - Let Love Win

2025 Loudoun Doubles Fall Women · Loudoun Doubles Fall 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.78 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-24vs BrillLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Kropf / Yang Michelle Su vs Wendy Hopkins / Jill Poretz4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJerien Okoh-Tisch / Nancy Cours vs Catherine Mitchell / Tara Brill2-6, 4-6
2025-11-07vs Aguiar - Tennis SharksLost 12
L#1 DoublesJerien Okoh-Tisch / Yang Michelle Su vs Mairin Kuligowski / Mary Newburn6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCecelia Campbell / Meghan Wisecarver vs Mandy Bertin / JoAnn Perry6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPaige Fishel / Sueyun Hsieh vs Smita Aguiar / Griffin Mauk5-7, 2-6
2025-10-31vs Zimmerman - Doubles or NothingLost 01
L#2 DoublesYang Michelle Su / Sueyun Hsieh vs Mary Ann Larson / Kate Donadoni0-6, 4-6
2025-10-21vs BrillWon 30
W#1 DoublesJerien Okoh-Tisch / Cheryl Danner vs Eve Weber / Jill Poretz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErrin Matechak / Paige Fishel vs Laura Sagen / Paula Elmore6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHiba Kaissi / Meghan Wisecarver vs Maureen Bornholdt / Kendall Mccaughey7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-16vs Aguiar - Tennis SharksWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Cours / Errin Matechak vs Marguerite McFadden / Kari Whitney6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJerien Okoh-Tisch / Hiba Kaissi vs Griffin Mauk / Nancy Trainer7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMeghan Wisecarver / Cheryl Danner vs Mandy Bertin / Brittany Persino5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Zimmerman - Doubles or NothingLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaige Fishel / Cheryl Danner vs Andrea Moore / Beth Kaufman0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJerien Okoh-Tisch / Yang Michelle Su vs Carrie Cardiff / Mary Gill4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMeghan Wisecarver / Sueyun Hsieh vs Kristin Satterfield / Paige Bartlett7-6, 6-4
2025-09-30vs BrillSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Cours / Meghan Wisecarver vs Wendy Hopkins / Laura Sagen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Kropf / Jerien Okoh-Tisch vs Jacquelyn Worman / Kendall Mccaughey6-3, 6-2
2025-09-25vs Aguiar - Tennis SharksLost 12
W#1 DoublesJerien Okoh-Tisch / Yang Michelle Su vs Griffin Mauk / Kari Whitney6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaurie Peacock / Meghan Wisecarver vs Smita Aguiar / Mary Newburn6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Danner / Sueyun Hsieh vs Nancy Trainer / Marguerite McFadden3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Doubles Fall 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Yang Michelle Su
published
3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Cecelia Campbell
published 4
3.79
Anna Kropf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Nancy Cours
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Jerien Okoh-Tisch
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.65
Meghan Wisecarver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.63
Hiba Kaissi
published
3.60
Sueyun Hsieh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Laurie Peacock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Kropf + Jerien Okoh-Tisch6263% games+12.1% vs expected
Laurie Peacock + Jerien Okoh-Tisch10754% games+9.6% vs expected
Errin Matechak + Meghan Wisecarver11757% games+2.5% vs expected
Nancy Cours + Jerien Okoh-Tisch5259% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Peacock + Sueyun Hsieh033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yang Michelle Su
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Cecelia Campbell
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Anna Kropf
44W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Nancy Cours
53W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Jerien Okoh-Tisch
122W–86L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Meghan Wisecarver
29W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Hiba Kaissi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Sueyun Hsieh
141W–113L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Laurie Peacock
39W–60L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.