Teams

Betancourt/META

2026 Mixed 18 & over-META · 3.0 Mixed Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-23vs Jordan/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesTimothy Heimbach / Anita Jilton vs Hunter Holt / Kelly Kattesh4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristina Betancourt / John Hilton vs Madga Cox / Jeff Moffatt3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Austin Helton vs Bella Pappano / Mark Kevitt6-3, 6-2
2026-07-18vs Jordan/METASplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Chris Blackstone vs Makie Kordamiri / Hunter Holt3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAustin Helton / Anita Jilton vs Margaret Wells / Mark Kevitt6-2, 6-0
2026-07-08vs Jordan/METAWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Chris Blackstone vs Mark Kevitt / Madga Cox6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Betancourt / Timothy Heimbach vs Makie Kordamiri / Chris Holt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynne Little / John Hilton vs Bella Pappano / Hunter Holt2-6, 3-6
2026-06-28vs Jordan/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesAustin Helton / Lynne Little vs Keo Jur / Jeff Moffatt1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEve Little Bradford / Timothy Heimbach vs Chris Holt / Kari Holt6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Dante de la Riva vs Joan Hagood / Hunter Holt2-6, 0-6
2026-06-27vs Jordan/METAWon 20
W#1 DoublesEve Little Bradford / Austin Helton vs Jerry Deehan / Kari Holt6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTimothy Heimbach / Anita Jilton vs Hunter Holt / Margaret Wells6-2, 7-5
2026-06-20vs Jordan/METALost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Jilton / Austin Helton vs Jeff Moffatt / Madga Cox3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBarb Janiszewski / Dante de la Riva vs Robert Bunch / Keo Jur6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Betancourt / John Hilton vs Kari Holt / Hunter Holt5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Chris Blackstone
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.19
Eve Little Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Lynne Little
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Timothy Heimbach
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Anita Jilton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Christina Betancourt
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.96
Austin Helton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.94
Dante de la Riva
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Barb Janiszewski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
John Hilton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Little + Austin Helton213 matchesnot enough data
Barb Janiszewski + Chris Blackstone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Blackstone
11W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Eve Little Bradford
25W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Lynne Little
31W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Timothy Heimbach
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Anita Jilton
33W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Christina Betancourt
5W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Austin Helton
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Dante de la Riva
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Barb Janiszewski
12W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
John Hilton
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.